[PATCH] fix usage in simplify_seteq_setne()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The usage was removed before the new operands were used
which can lead to undefined pseudos.

Fix this by moving the call to remove_usage() where
it should always have been: after the call to use_pseudo().

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 simplify.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/simplify.c b/simplify.c
index 3bc9985e8..76a599e50 100644
--- a/simplify.c
+++ b/simplify.c
@@ -432,7 +432,8 @@ static int compare_opcode(int opcode, int inverse)
 
 static int simplify_seteq_setne(struct instruction *insn, long long value)
 {
-	struct instruction *def = insn->src1->def;
+	pseudo_t old = insn->src1;
+	struct instruction *def = old->def;
 	pseudo_t src1, src2;
 	int inverse;
 	int opcode;
@@ -456,10 +457,10 @@ static int simplify_seteq_setne(struct instruction *insn, long long value)
 		// and similar for setne/eq ... 0/1
 		src1 = def->src1;
 		src2 = def->src2;
-		remove_usage(insn->src1, &insn->src1);
 		insn->opcode = compare_opcode(opcode, inverse);
 		use_pseudo(insn, src1, &insn->src1);
 		use_pseudo(insn, src2, &insn->src2);
+		remove_usage(old, &insn->src1);
 		return REPEAT_CSE;
 
 	default:
-- 
2.11.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux