Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So now that "fix value of label statement" is applied, you can
>> safely apply "fix killing of OP_SETVAL instructions" somewhere
>> after it, it won't create useless noise.
>
> I just noticed that you have added it at the top of sparse-next
> but what you applied (basically adding "case OP_SETVAL" in
> simplify_instruction()) is *not* what the patch I sent did
> (adding "case OP_SETVAL" in kill_instruction())s and causes
> quick crashes..
> I suppose there was a conflict or so.
>
> Do you want that I sent a new patch or can you solve it
> directly?

Strange. That is the only patch I found in my series.

Sure, go ahead and send me the new one. I will take out the
one in sparse-next and replace to your new one.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux