Fedora Development Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns
- Re: [Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates
- Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates
- Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates
- Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide
- Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Charalampos Stratakis
- Re: Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization
- Re: Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization
- perl-Test-PostgreSQL license change
- Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Compile Fedora with auto-vectorization
- Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Release fedpkg-1.32
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)
- Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Fedora Rawhide-20180303.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180303.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Correct way to perform a pull pull request?
- [Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 28 Blocker Review Meeting
- Re: Correct way to perform a pull pull request?
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?
- Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Correct way to perform a pull pull request?
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?
- Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?
- Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?
- Re: How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- How do you bump fedora-repos-rawhide to f29?
- Meeting March 5 (Monday)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Orphaning procedure for rubygem-review
- Re: [Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Test gate failures
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- [Test-Announce] 2018-03-05 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Official archiver of Fedora mailing lists shows e-mails with one day delay!
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Broken dependencies: FreeSOLID
- Reliability test for hard drives and SSD
- Re: Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: News in opencv package
- Fedora 28-20180302.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: why do I keep getting Broken dependencies: nfs-ganesha emails
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- why do I keep getting Broken dependencies: nfs-ganesha emails
- Re: BuildError: package PKGNAME not in list for tag f29-pending
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: News in opencv package
- Fedora 28 compose report: 20180302.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- [HEAD UP] soname bump Re: News in opencv package
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Appstream metadata compose failures
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender
- Re: Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- News in opencv package
- Appstream metadata compose failures
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- BuildError: package PKGNAME not in list for tag f29-pending
- Re: <DKIM> Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost
- Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender
- Re: Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Fedora 28-20180301.n.1 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Fedora 28 compose report: 20180301.n.1 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Branched 20180301.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180301.n.0 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Call for users of darkserver
- Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- Re: qarte - compilation fails
- From: Charalampos Stratakis
- Re: Proposal: new really minimal 'System' group (Core reduced more)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Proposal: new really minimal 'System' group (Core reduced more)
- can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?
- From: Farhad Mohammadi Majd
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Fedora Rawhide-20180301.n.0 compose check report
- From: Fedora compose checker
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
- /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- qarte - compilation fails
- Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Open Seats on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-03-01 17:00 UTC)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes (was: Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21))
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi
- Re: march VFAD for the atomic working group
- Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-02)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- march VFAD for the atomic working group
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- packmol license change
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 27.93
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)
- Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Review Request: swift-lang (Apple's Swift programming language)
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: News in net-snmp package
- Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)
- Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- From: Robert-André Mauchin
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- From: Nathanael D. Noblet
- News in net-snmp package
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- [package review] f28-backgrounds ready for review
- Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now
- From: Charalampos Stratakis
- Re: <DKIM> Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- REMINDER: Software Translation Deadline in 1 week
- F28 Software String Freeze is today
- Fedora 28 Spins page: spin/labs owners please test
- REMINDER: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze in 1 week
- Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: runroot changing during the course of a rawhide pungi run
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- COPR src.fp.o auto-rebuilds
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours
- Re: need sponsorship for package
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- need sponsorship for package
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27
- Re: Help needed with new segfaults in frame unwinding under gcc8
- Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] soxr-0.1.3-1.fc27
- Re: Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Help for fixing %install spec file section (Error make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.)
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- Re: fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- fedora28 and strong crypto settings
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- News in netpbm package.
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: Multilib issue: apitrace-libs.i686 version mismatches apitrace-libs.x86_64 on F27
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++
- Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Lazarus vs. FPC updates
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: F29 Self Contained Change: FedoraScientific VagrantBox
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Re: Using LTO for Fedora package builds
- Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]