On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:29:38PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking that spec > > files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I > > think we'd be better having a post-build test warning that this package > > has files missing from the previous build. That could be advisory, or > > it could even gate, with the packager clearing the gate by updating the > > file list in the test, rather than in the spec file. > If you still have to keep a list, why is it better to keep it in tests Separation of concerns. But also, you shouldn't have to keep a list per se, just annotations of when it's okay that the list has changed. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
