28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > > > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > > This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of > > these failed builds. > > > > gcc is not the only compiler that reads header files Also, do the header files actually *require* gcc to be present? I know it makes sense to have both installed but there are potential use cases where a user may need only the devel packages but not gcc: - abrt may need devel packages to generate readable stack traces, - a user may use a different compiler than gcc (e.g., compat-gcc-34). Regards, Rafal _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
