Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH block:for-3.3/core] cfq: merged request shouldn't jump to a different cfqq
- From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the v9fs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block:for-3.3/core] cfq: merged request shouldn't jump to a different cfqq
- From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block:for-3.3/core] cfq: merged request shouldn't jump to a different cfqq
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH block:for-3.3/core] cfq: merged request shouldn't jump to a different cfqq
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the net-next tree
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the net-next tree
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
- From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()
- From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/6] ath6kl: create ath6kl_core.ko
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/6] ath6kl: create core.c
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/6] ath6kl: unify cfg80211 init/cleanup functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/6] ath6kl: rename vif init and cleanup functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/6] ath6kl: create ath6kl_core.ko
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the selinux tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext3 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] ath6kl: convert ath6kl_dbg() and ath6kl_dbg_dump() into functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] ath6kl: create ath6kl_core.ko
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] ath6kl: rename vif init and cleanup functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] ath6kl: get rid of AR_DBG_LVL_CHECK()
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] ath6kl: create core.c
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] ath6kl: create ath6kl_core.ko
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] ath6kl: unify cfg80211 init/cleanup functions
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (gpu/drm/nouveau)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the s390 tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (usb/otg)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the s5p tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the s5p tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tip tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: force building as a module
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree
- From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ath6kl: force building as a module
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM context switch changes for -next
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
- From: "hpanvin@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: merge of the wireless-next tree into the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: interesting merges in the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM context switch changes for -next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- ARM context switch changes for -next
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (gfs2)
- From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the logfs tree
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the devicetree tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the logfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext3 tree
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure
- From: Carles Pey <carles.pey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (nfnetlink)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (nfnetlink)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (nfnetlink)
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (nfnetlink)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (irqdomain.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (nfnetlink)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (fs-writeback)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (via_wdt)
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 28 (via_wdt)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 28
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the l2-mtd tree
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the l2-mtd tree
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the logfs tree
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tmem tree with the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the s5p tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the s5p tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the logfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext3 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the block tree
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH block/for-3.3/core] block: an exiting task should be allowed to create io_context
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kbuild tree back at kernel.org
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- kbuild tree back at kernel.org
- From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
- From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
- From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [net-next] stmmac: fix missing module license in the main.
- From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 22 (netdev/stmmac)
- From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 22 (netdev/stmmac)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure
- From: Carles Pey <carles.pey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
- From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
- From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
- From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: boot failure for next-20111216
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparc: __mcount_loc already exists
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparc: __mcount_loc already exists
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fbdev: matroxfb: Fix compilation after fb_var_screeninfo change
- From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb: fix renesas mod_gadget printk format warning
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb: fix renesas mod_gadget printk format warning
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] usb: fix renesas mod_gadget printk format warning
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] usb: fix renesas mod_gadget printk format warning
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21 (xen)
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 21 (xen)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
- From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
- From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the tree
- From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparc: __mcount_loc already exists (was: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.2-rc6)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the 4xx tree
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the 4xx tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fbdev: matroxfb: Fix compilation after fb_var_screeninfo change
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip and rcu trees
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ath9k: fix roadkill due to Joe's patch on ath_dbg() changes
- From: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip and rcu trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the fbdev tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the cputime tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ath9k: fix roadkill due to Joe's patch on ath_dbg() changes
- From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
- From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
- From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (xen)
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (nfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (staging/media/go7007)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (xen)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (usb/gadget/langwell)
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the xfs tree
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the uprobes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with tLinus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the xfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Missing gpio/merge branch from linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next tree for s390 and cputime
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: strange commit in the uprobes tree
- From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mips tree related)
- From: David Daney <david.s.daney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: strange commit in the uprobes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mips tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (usb/gadget/langwell)
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (leds/tca6507)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (intel_scu & abp_timer)
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (intel_scu & abp_timer)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 16 (usb/gadget/langwell)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (staging/rtl8192e)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 9 (ibmphp)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Missing gpio/merge branch from linux-next
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the pci-current tree
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the pci-current tree
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next tree for s390 and cputime
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the pci-current tree
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-merge tree
- From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-merge tree
- From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the pci-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (memcontrol)
- From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-merge tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (memcontrol)
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 15 (memcontrol)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-merge tree
- From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the iommu tree
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Ashish Jangam <Ashish.Jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the regmap tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-merge tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (staging/rtl8192e)
- From: Sean MacLennan <seanm@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (mlx4)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (phy vs. bcma)
- From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (net)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (phy vs. bcma)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the cgroup tree
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the cgroup tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 9 (ibmphp)
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the cgroup tree
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (kvm/vmx.c)
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 14
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the cgroup tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the cgroup tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (staging/rtl8192e)
- From: Sean MacLennan <seanm@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 9 (ibmphp)
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (kvm/vmx.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 13 (mrst/intel_scu/apb_timer)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile error with 85xx/p1022_ds.c
- From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: rename virtqueue_add_buf_gfp to virtqueue_add_buf
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: rename virtqueue_add_buf_gfp to virtqueue_add_buf
- From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] serial: fix Kconfig for Freescale 16550
- From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] serial: fix Kconfig for Freescale 16550
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] serial: fix Kconfig for Freescale 16550
- From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] serial: fix Kconfig for Freescale 16550
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] serial: fix Kconfig for Freescale 16550
- From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Staging: VME: PIO2: Add GPIOLIB dependancy
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Staging: VME: PIO2: Add GPIOLIB dependancy
- From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (staging/rtl8192e)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (staging/vme)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 9 (ibmphp)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re-add ibft tree to linux-next please
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH -next] xshm: fix build errors, depends on NET
- From: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless-next tree
- From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless-next tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile error with 85xx/p1022_ds.c
- From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error while fetching the hexagon quilt series
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] xshm: fix build errors, depends on NET
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error while fetching the hexagon quilt series
- From: Richard Kuo <rkuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Adding remoteproc/rpmsg to linux-next
- From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the memblock tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile error with 85xx/p1010rdb.c
- From: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: error while fetching the hexagon quilt series
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile error with 85xx/p1023_rds.c
- From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the xshm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
- From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
- From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (hid/hid-wiimote)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (kvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] linux-next:et131x: Revert changes from previous commit
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please include xshm in linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Movement of pinctrl for-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Please include xshm in linux-next
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Movement of pinctrl for-next tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
- From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
- From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] linux-next:et131x: Revert changes from previous commit
- From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
- From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: unable to fetch the arm-current and arm trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (staging/vme)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (x86, not SMP)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] x86, intel_mid: Kconfig select fix
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the arm tree
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the vhost tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] x86/intel_mid: Fix the Kconfig for MID selection
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next web page needs updating
- From: Julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH pm/linux-next] cgroup_freezer: drop unnecessary freezing() from try_to_freeze_cgroup()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 28 (mrst)
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 28 (mrst)
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 28 (mrst)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 5 (staging/et131x)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
- From: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
- From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the s5p tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the s5p tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
- From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
- From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Please add my tree to linux-next
- From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] exit: fix writeback build errors
- From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] exit: fix writeback build errors
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the 4xx tree
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next not booting on snowball
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Dec 1
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]