Hi Mikey, On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. > > In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user > selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2. Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp8vzNc0aBAo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
