On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mikey, > > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. > > > > In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user > > selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2. > > Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow. This is my fault. Grant's patch had a collision and I manually fixed it up. While doing that, I put back MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ which the patch originally took out. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
