Hello,
The patch "CPUfreq ondemand: handle QoS request on DVFS response latency" that introduced the mentioned errors requires the patch "PM / QoS: Introduce new classes: DMA-Throughput and DVFS-Latency" get merged, too. I guess that patch will be at pm-qos tree if get merged (v2 patch has been released 7 days ago).
Cheers!
MyungJoo.
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Stephen Rothwell<sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : 2012-03-01 11:56 (GMT+09:00)
Title : linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpufreq tree
Hi Dave,
After merging the cpufreq tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_init':
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:880:28: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c: In function 'cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit':
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c:896:25: error: 'PM_QOS_DVFS_RESPONSE_LATENCY' undeclared (first use in this function)
Caused by commit 500e8ca39c56 ("[CPUFREQ] ondemand: handle QoS request on
DVFS response latency").
I have used the cpufreq tree fomr next-20120229 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
MyungJoo Ham (함명주), PHD
System S/W Lab, S/W Platform Team, Software Center
Samsung Electronics
Cell: +82-10-6714-2858ÿ淸º{.nÇ+돴윯돪†+%듚ÿ깁負¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+돴¥Š{깸w굣悖¶썳變}©옽Æ zÚ&j:+v돣 ? ®w?듺2듷솳鈺Ú&¢)傘«a뛴ÿÿ鎬z요z받쀺+껠šŽ듶¢jÿŠw療f
