Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the omap-fixes tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master baseline: 117 runs, 5 regressions (next-20200609)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes baseline: 120 runs, 4 regressions (v5.7-13207-g0a095ef39b5b)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 165 builds: 6 failed, 159 passed, 7 errors, 1992 warnings (next-20200609)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 143 builds: 3 failed, 140 passed, 3 errors, 129 warnings (v5.7-13207-g0a095ef39b5b)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Move p?d_alloc_track to separate header file
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Move p?d_alloc_track to separate header file
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Move p?d_alloc_track to separate header file
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mm: Move p?d_alloc_track to separate header file
  • From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHv5 1/1] ext4: mballoc: Use raw_cpu_ptr instead of this_cpu_ptr
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-06-08-22-35 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-06-08-22-33 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the vhost tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master baseline: 112 runs, 2 regressions (next-20200608)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 154 builds: 9 failed, 145 passed, 76 errors, 1955 warnings (next-20200608)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes baseline: 132 runs, 3 regressions (v5.7-12631-g7925a52a5e45)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 147 builds: 6 failed, 141 passed, 6 errors, 118 warnings (v5.7-12631-g7925a52a5e45)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6910
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/198
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code in ext4_mb_new_blocks
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6793
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/4205
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/41
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code in ext4_mb_new_blocks
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+f72682b02970a74a7858@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6793
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+878f276b4892a4438f95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/4205
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+5c2f1b4ae8c49a698784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/41
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+9ce464e21fc2ab95dbf3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6910
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+c2a0ce95f0c47bcd4b37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/198
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+ca020d38a27ddc8e3cae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the risc-v tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master baseline: 162 runs, 4 regressions (next-20200605)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc_docs tree
  • From: "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc_docs tree
  • From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 173 builds: 7 failed, 166 passed, 31 errors, 2017 warnings (next-20200605)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] software node: recursively unregister child swnodes
  • From: Jordan Hand <jorhand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fw: next/pending-fixes build: 162 builds: 2 failed, 160 passed, 2 errors, 109 warnings (v5.7-8671-g086779e58c68)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fw: next/pending-fixes build: 162 builds: 2 failed, 160 passed, 2 errors, 109 warnings (v5.7-8671-g086779e58c68)
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fw: next/pending-fixes build: 162 builds: 2 failed, 160 passed, 2 errors, 109 warnings (v5.7-8671-g086779e58c68)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] software node: recursively unregister child swnodes
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the modules tree
  • From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the modules tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-current tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next 04 June: warning: "ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE" is not defined
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the livepatching tree with the modules tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 257 boots: 6 failed, 240 passed with 6 offline, 5 untried/unknown (v5.7-8671-g086779e58c68)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6731
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/6740
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6726
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6927
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/46
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6728
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6728
  • From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-current tree
  • From: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6728
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+aed048f49c59eb997737@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fw: next/pending-fixes build: 162 builds: 2 failed, 160 passed, 2 errors, 109 warnings (v5.7-8671-g086779e58c68)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 162 builds: 2 failed, 160 passed, 2 errors, 109 warnings (v5.7-8671-g086779e58c68)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the f2fs tree
  • From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the nfsd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the f2fs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] software node: recursively unregister child swnodes
  • From: Jordan Hand <jorhand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] software node: recursively unregister child swnodes
  • From: Jordan Hand <jorhand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix pud_alloc_track()
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] software node: recursively unregister child swnodes
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] software node: recursively unregister child swnodes
  • From: jorhand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix pud_alloc_track()
  • From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix pud_alloc_track()
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix pud_alloc_track()
  • From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure on powerpc 8xx with 16k pages
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4 (gpu/drm/bridge/sil-sii8620)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure on powerpc 8xx with 16k pages
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure on powerpc 8xx with 16k pages
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 144 boots: 6 failed, 134 passed with 2 offline, 2 untried/unknown (next-20200604)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the scmi tree
  • From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the scmi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure on powerpc 8xx with 16k pages
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure on powerpc 8xx with 16k pages
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure on powerpc 8xx with 16k pages
  • From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 166 builds: 6 failed, 160 passed, 29 errors, 1964 warnings (next-20200604)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mainline][Oops][bisected 2ba3e6 ] 5.7.0 boot fails with kernel panic on powerpc
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mm: Fix pud_alloc_track()
  • From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mainline][Oops][bisected 2ba3e6 ] 5.7.0 boot fails with kernel panic on powerpc
  • From: Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 225 boots: 9 failed, 212 passed with 3 offline, 1 untried/unknown (v5.7-4607-g4ce9138f1bd4)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 152 builds: 4 failed, 148 passed, 4 errors, 100 warnings (v5.7-4607-g4ce9138f1bd4)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the clk tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• media: atomisp RIP: 0010:gmin_subdev_add.cold+0x318/0x327
  • From: youling 257 <youling257@xxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-06-03-17-54 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with the clk tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 71 boots: 3 failed, 59 passed with 2 offline, 4 untried/unknown, 3 conflicts (next-20200603)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the amdgpu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] tracing/doc: Fix ascii-art in histogram-design.rst
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the amdgpu tree
  • From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the amdgpu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 167 builds: 17 failed, 150 passed, 146 errors, 192 warnings (next-20200603)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree
  • From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
  • From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] tracing/doc: Fix ascii-art in histogram-design.rst
  • From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
  • From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mainline][Oops][bisected 2ba3e6 ] 5.7.0 boot fails with kernel panic on powerpc
  • From: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: arm64 build issue and mainline crash (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 3)
  • From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mainline][Oops][bisected 2ba3e6 ] 5.7.0 boot fails with kernel panic on powerpc
  • From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [mainline][Oops][bisected 2ba3e6 ] 5.7.0 boot fails with kernel panic on powerpc
  • From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-sh for-next reactivation
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: arm64 build issue and mainline crash (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 3)
  • From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: arm64 build failed - aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find ./drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.abuilt-in.a: No such file or directory
  • From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: arm64 build failed - aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find ./drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.abuilt-in.a: No such file or directory
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: arm64 build issue and mainline crash (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 3)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• arm64 build issue and mainline crash (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 3)
  • From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [mainline][Oops][bisected 2ba3e6 ] 5.7.0 boot fails with kernel panic on powerpc
  • From: Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHv5 1/1] ext4: mballoc: Use raw_cpu_ptr instead of this_cpu_ptr
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fix ups for clashes between akpm and powerpc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHv5 1/1] ext4: mballoc: Use raw_cpu_ptr instead of this_cpu_ptr
  • From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] ext4: mballoc: Use raw_cpu_ptr instead of this_cpu_ptr
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6792
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree
  • From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kselftest tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the overlayfs tree
  • From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-sh for-next reactivation
  • From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 214 boots: 4 failed, 202 passed with 4 offline, 4 untried/unknown (v5.7-3707-g4973fabb59f6)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb-next tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 171 builds: 1 failed, 170 passed, 1 error, 123 warnings (v5.7-3707-g4973fabb59f6)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the overlayfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-sh for-next reactivation
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 2 (x86/xen)
  • From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-sh for-next reactivation
  • From: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 2 (vfio)
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 127 boots: 4 failed, 119 passed with 2 offline, 2 untried/unknown (next-20200602)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hyperv tree with the kvm tree
  • From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hyperv tree with the kvm tree
  • From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 172 builds: 7 failed, 165 passed, 43 errors, 2010 warnings (next-20200602)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 2 (x86/xen)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 2 (vfio)
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 2 (vfio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hyperv tree with the kvm tree
  • From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCHv5 1/1] ext4: mballoc: Use raw_cpu_ptr instead of this_cpu_ptr
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6792
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re: linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6792
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+82f324bb69744c5f6969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6731
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+7f2b4a7d4281e8c2aad0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/6740
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+8ea916061cc749544c8f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: systemd-rfkill/6726
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+94f7894cc5600cc07094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: kworker/u4:LINE/46
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+4d28f1825b8fb92fa383@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6927
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+cd8a20b91d68ef113b45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next test error: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [ADDR] code: syz-fuzzer/6792
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+82f324bb69744c5f6969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the net-next tree
  • From: Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the hyperv tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the net-next tree
  • From: Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the hyperv tree with the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 244 boots: 5 failed, 229 passed with 4 offline, 6 untried/unknown (v5.7-930-g3a1d4c3e458b)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-sh for-next reactivation
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 162 builds: 1 failed, 161 passed, 1 error, 150 warnings (v5.7-930-g3a1d4c3e458b)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-sh for-next reactivation
  • From: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the ext4 tree
  • From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the clk tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the ntb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the mmc tree
  • From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the irqchip tree
  • From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the irqchip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the clk tree
  • From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the clk tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-29-16-09 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 204 boots: 17 failed, 180 passed with 2 offline, 5 untried/unknown (next-20200529)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the rsic-v tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the mips tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 29 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 29 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 29 (ocfs2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs-anna tree
  • From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 179 builds: 10 failed, 169 passed, 9 errors, 2035 warnings (next-20200529)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] x86/uaccess: Remove redundant likely/unlikely annotations
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86/uaccess: Remove redundant likely/unlikely annotations
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree
  • From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the bluetooth tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 186 boots: 17 failed, 163 passed with 3 offline, 3 untried/unknown (next-20200528)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the spi-nor tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 125 boots: 2 failed, 114 passed with 4 offline, 5 untried/unknown (v5.7-rc7-238-g59fcbde6ab90)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the spi-nor tree
  • From: <Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 160 builds: 8 failed, 152 passed, 7 errors, 2450 warnings (next-20200528)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 145 builds: 2 failed, 143 passed, 1 error, 152 warnings (v5.7-rc7-238-g59fcbde6ab90)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree
  • From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the nfsd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the erofs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs-anna tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs-anna tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the coresight tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the spi-nor tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] block: add another struct gendisk to <linux/blkdev.h>
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the rsic-v tree
  • From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] block: add another struct gendisk to <linux/blkdev.h>
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-13-20-30 uploaded (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (objtool 2/2)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the fsinfo tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the fsinfo tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the rsic-v tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the fsinfo tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the aspeed tree
  • From: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the nand tree
  • From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the aspeed tree
  • From: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the nand tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the amdgpu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the coresight tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the kvm-fixes tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Martin Jambor <mjambor@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next/master bisection: baseline.login on meson-sm1-sei610
  • From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 264 boots: 8 failed, 244 passed with 5 offline, 7 untried/unknown (v5.7-rc7-144-g6edb22d07477)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-25-16-56 uploaded (mtd/nand/raw/arasan-nand-controller)
  • From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 263 boots: 17 failed, 235 passed with 4 offline, 7 untried/unknown (next-20200526)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (hwmon/amd_energy.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (hwmon/amd_energy.c)
  • From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 217 builds: 1 failed, 216 passed, 1 error, 162 warnings (v5.7-rc7-144-g6edb22d07477)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (hwmon/amd_energy.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 226 builds: 14 failed, 212 passed, 14 errors, 2097 warnings (next-20200526)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc_docs tree
  • From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next build error (8)
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 272 boots: 21 failed, 239 passed with 4 offline, 7 untried/unknown, 1 conflict (next-20200525)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 228 builds: 15 failed, 213 passed, 23 errors, 2085 warnings (next-20200525)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the watchdog tree
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-25-16-56 uploaded (mtd/nand/raw/arasan-nand-controller)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree
  • From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the watchdog tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: "Singh, Balbir" <sblbir@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-25-16-56 uploaded (drm/nouveau)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-25-16-56 uploaded (drm/nouveau)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-25-16-56 uploaded (drm/nouveau)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-25-16-56 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the jc_docs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 25 (fs/io_uring)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 25 (fs/io_uring)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 25 (fs/io_uring)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 25 (fs/io_uring)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the iommu tree
  • From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nand tree
  • From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next/master bisection: baseline.login on panda
  • From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the btrfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nand tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the notifications tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the notifications tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next/master bisection: baseline.login on meson-sm1-sei610
  • From: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 177 boots: 5 failed, 168 passed with 4 offline (v5.7-rc6-387-ge8afbc5782a5)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-24-22-09 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 217 builds: 1 failed, 216 passed, 1 error, 162 warnings (v5.7-rc6-387-ge8afbc5782a5)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: psample: fix build error when CONFIG_INET is not enabled
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-22-20-35 uploaded (phy/intel/phy-intel-combo.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 244 boots: 19 failed, 216 passed with 6 offline, 3 untried/unknown (next-20200522)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 228 builds: 10 failed, 218 passed, 10 errors, 2046 warnings (next-20200522)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-22-20-35 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rtrs: get rid of the do_next_path while_next_path macros
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net-next v2] net: psample: fix build error when CONFIG_INET is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next] net: psample: depends on INET
  • From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next] net: psample: depends on INET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next] net: psample: depends on INET
  • From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next] net: psample: depends on INET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 22 (net/psample/)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-21-20-42 uploaded (atomisp)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 245 boots: 19 failed, 219 passed with 4 offline, 3 untried/unknown (next-20200521)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 222 builds: 5 failed, 217 passed, 7 errors, 190 warnings (next-20200521)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 239 boots: 7 failed, 225 passed with 4 offline, 3 untried/unknown (v5.7-rc6-275-gdbacbfd47d67)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the aspeed tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm-soc tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] RDMA/rtrs: get rid of the do_next_path while_next_path macros
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 217 builds: 1 failed, 216 passed, 1 error, 162 warnings (v5.7-rc6-275-gdbacbfd47d67)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the djw-vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-21-20-42 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21 (objtool warnings)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm-soc tree
  • From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 246 boots: 10 failed, 228 passed with 4 offline, 4 untried/unknown (v5.7-rc6-239-gc0a2bce73a89)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the fscrypt tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the aspeed tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 217 builds: 1 failed, 216 passed, 1 error, 162 warnings (v5.7-rc6-239-gc0a2bce73a89)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree
  • From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the f2fs tree with the fscrypt tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tags needs some work in the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Chris Down <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the imx-mxs tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: BUG: Invalid wait context ]
  • From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: BUG: Invalid wait context ]
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BUG: sleeping function called from atomic due to "Balance initial LPI affinity across CPUs"
  • From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kgdboc: Disable all the early code when kgdboc is a module
  • From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the imx-mxs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (block/rnbd/)
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next/master bisection: baseline.login on panda
  • From: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BUG: sleeping function called from atomic due to "Balance initial LPI affinity across CPUs"
  • From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.o)
  • From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BUG: sleeping function called from atomic due to "Balance initial LPI affinity across CPUs"
  • From: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the aspeed tree
  • From: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next boot error: BUG: Invalid wait context ]
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+08003d278f04ed0944e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-19-21-47 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 256 boots: 11 failed, 236 passed with 4 offline, 5 untried/unknown (next-20200519)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 221 builds: 5 failed, 216 passed, 5 errors, 196 warnings (next-20200519)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.o)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix RTRS compilation with block layer disabled
  • From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
• BUG: sleeping function called from atomic due to "Balance initial LPI affinity across CPUs"
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kgdboc: Disable all the early code when kgdboc is a module
  • From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (block/rnbd/)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the nfs-anna tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 12 (fs/namespace.c)
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the rcu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kgdb tree
  • From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kgdboc: Disable all the early code when kgdboc is a module
  • From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kgdb tree
  • From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kgdb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] rtrs-clt: silence kbuild test inconsistent intenting smatch warning
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 278 boots: 9 failed, 257 passed with 4 offline, 8 untried/unknown (v5.7-rc6-175-gcf2c233130ca)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the wireless-drivers-next tree
  • From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the wireless-drivers-next tree
  • From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix RTRS compilation with block layer disabled
  • From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] rnbd/rtrs: pass max segment size from blk user to the rdma library
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/1] Fix RTRS compilation with block layer disabled
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c)
  • From: Danil Kipnis <danil.kipnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 217 builds: 1 failed, 216 passed, 1 error, 162 warnings (v5.7-rc6-175-gcf2c233130ca)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the drm-misc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• inux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-msm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-15-16-29 uploaded
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the keys tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 175 boots: 8 failed, 159 passed with 5 offline, 3 untried/unknown (next-20200518)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the vfs and net-next trees
  • From: Stephen Kitt <steve@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v4] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>
• next/master build: 227 builds: 1 failed, 226 passed, 1 error, 2045 warnings (next-20200518)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How should we handle a bool depending on a tristate?
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (x86/mm/pgtable.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)
  • From: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• How should we handle a bool depending on a tristate?
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the scmi tree
  • From: André Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mm: mkfs.ext4 invoked oom-killer on i386 - pagecache_get_page
  • From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the wireless-drivers-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the wireless-drivers-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: [PATCH v2] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the vfs and net-next trees
  • From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• [PATCH v2] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the scmi tree
  • From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the scmi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mtd-fixes tree
  • From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes boot: 236 boots: 10 failed, 217 passed with 5 offline, 4 untried/unknown (v5.7-rc5-557-gf7a4ee5329e2)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree
  • From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU
  • From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the rcu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the rcu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the keys tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/pending-fixes build: 217 builds: 0 failed, 217 passed, 162 warnings (v5.7-rc5-557-gf7a4ee5329e2)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the vfs and net-next trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mtd-fixes tree
  • From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mtd-fixes tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] proc: proc_pid_ns takes super_block as an argument
  • From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the rcu tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2020-05-15-16-29 uploaded
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2020-05-15-16-29 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next/master boot: 289 boots: 16 failed, 262 passed with 5 offline, 6 untried/unknown (next-20200515)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU
  • From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• next/master build: 228 builds: 11 failed, 217 passed, 2 errors, 2138 warnings (next-20200515)
  • From: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 (nfs/fsinfo.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 (nfs/fsinfo.c)
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 (nfs/fsinfo.c)
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the parisc-hd tree
  • From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 (nfs/fsinfo.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 12 (fs/namespace.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next boot error: general protection fault in tomoyo_get_local_path
  • From: syzbot <syzbot+c1af344512918c61362c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>