Hi Al,
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:51:11AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:45:01AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/erofs/super.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > e7cda1ee94f4 ("erofs: code cleanup by removing ifdef macro surrounding")
> >
> > from the erofs tree and commit:
> >
> > 91a7c5e1d30e ("erofs: convert to use the new mount fs_context api")
> >
> > from the vfs tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc fs/erofs/super.c
> > index 8e46d204a0c2,2c0bad903fa6..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > @@@ -408,16 -365,12 +365,9 @@@ static int erofs_fc_fill_super(struct s
> > sb->s_time_gran = 1;
> >
> > sb->s_op = &erofs_sops;
> > -
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR
> > sb->s_xattr = erofs_xattr_handlers;
> > -#endif
> >
> > - /* set erofs default mount options */
> > - erofs_default_options(sbi);
> > -
> > - err = erofs_parse_options(sb, data);
> > - if (err)
> > - return err;
> > -
> > - if (test_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL))
> > + if (test_opt(ctx, POSIX_ACL))
> > sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL;
> > else
> > sb->s_flags &= ~SB_POSIXACL;
>
> FWIW, I would be glad to have that old erofs commit moved over to
> erofs tree... Folks?
I'm fine with that, although I think it's mainly with vfs changes
so could be better though with vfs tree. I will add this patch
tomorrow anyway... Thanks for reminder!
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
