On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 07:41:05 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)>] > Hi Rich, > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:28:33 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 03:00:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Rich, > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:11:39 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Could you reactivate linux-next pull from my arch/sh for-next branch? > > > > It's where it was before, at: > > > > > > > > git://git.libc.org/linux-sh for-next > > > > > > > > and has newly accepted patches ready. > > > > > > I already have an SH tree from > > > git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git#sh-next . Should > > > I do anything with that one? > > > > > > It currently contains: > > > > > > $ git log --oneline origin/master..sh/sh-next > > > a193018e5290 (sh/sh-next) sh: add missing EXPORT_SYMBOL() for __delay > > > 1d5fd6c33b04 sh: add missing DECLARE_EXPORT() for __ashiftrt_r4_xx > > > d70f1e3d5dbd Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into sh-next > > > baf58858e8b6 sh: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h > > > 8619b5a9035a sh: Drop -Werror from kernel Makefile > > > 3a3a78124693 sh: kernel: disassemble: Mark expected switch fall-throughs > > > fb8f77490f55 sh: kernel: hw_breakpoint: Fix missing break in switch statement > > > cd10afbc932d sh: remove unneeded uapi asm-generic wrappers > > > cbfc6edb6a4a sh: use __builtin_constant_p() directly instead of IS_IMMEDIATE() > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > I completely forgot that you had the tree from our other co-maintainer > > Yoshinori Sato on the list linux-next is pulling from. Would it be > > okay to keep both? That would help with quickly identifying and > > resolving any conflicting commits and make things go more smoothly > > with two maintainers trying to be active. > > > > Let me know if this doesn't work for you and we'll figure out > > alternative arrangements. > > Added from today (I called it "sh-rf" - if you want a different name, > please let me know). > > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As > you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. > > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have > been: > * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's > Signed-off-by, > * posted to the relevant mailing list, > * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), > * successfully unit tested, and > * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [2 OpenPGP digital signature <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>] > No public key for 015042F34957D06C created at 2020-06-03T07:41:05+0900 using RSA I only provided it temporarily. Plase remove git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git#sh-next Thanks. -- Yosinori Sato
