Hi Rich, On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 23:11:39 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Could you reactivate linux-next pull from my arch/sh for-next branch? > It's where it was before, at: > > git://git.libc.org/linux-sh for-next > > and has newly accepted patches ready. I already have an SH tree from git://git.sourceforge.jp/gitroot/uclinux-h8/linux.git#sh-next . Should I do anything with that one? It currently contains: $ git log --oneline origin/master..sh/sh-next a193018e5290 (sh/sh-next) sh: add missing EXPORT_SYMBOL() for __delay 1d5fd6c33b04 sh: add missing DECLARE_EXPORT() for __ashiftrt_r4_xx d70f1e3d5dbd Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into sh-next baf58858e8b6 sh: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h 8619b5a9035a sh: Drop -Werror from kernel Makefile 3a3a78124693 sh: kernel: disassemble: Mark expected switch fall-throughs fb8f77490f55 sh: kernel: hw_breakpoint: Fix missing break in switch statement cd10afbc932d sh: remove unneeded uapi asm-generic wrappers cbfc6edb6a4a sh: use __builtin_constant_p() directly instead of IS_IMMEDIATE() -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpr453FJbGOl.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
