Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>
> between commit:
>
> 35e32a6cb5f6 ("powerpc/syscalls: Split SPU-ness out of ABI")
>
> from the powerpc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 9b4feb630e8e ("arch: wire-up close_range()")
>
> from the pidfd tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks.
I thought the week between rc1 and rc2 would be a safe time to do that
conversion of the syscall table, but I guess I was wrong :)
I'm planning to send those changes to Linus for rc2, so the conflict
will then be vs mainline. But I guess it's pretty trivial so it doesn't
really matter.
cheers
> diff --cc arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index c0cdaacd770e,dd87a782d80e..000000000000
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@@ -480,6 -524,8 +480,7 @@@
> 434 common pidfd_open sys_pidfd_open
> 435 32 clone3 ppc_clone3 sys_clone3
> 435 64 clone3 sys_clone3
> -435 spu clone3 sys_ni_syscall
> + 436 common close_range sys_close_range
> 437 common openat2 sys_openat2
> 438 common pidfd_getfd sys_pidfd_getfd
> 439 common faccessat2 sys_faccessat2
