On 6/4/20 1:57 PM, Jordan Hand wrote:
On 6/4/20 1:15 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:36:23PM -0700, jorhand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That said, I suppose just ordering the nodes so that children come
before parents would also be fine. My thinking was just that accepting
any node ordering is simpler.
Oh, actually I just tried that out and software_node_register_nodes
doesn't allow this (parents must be added before children).
So I still think software_node_register_nodes and
software_node_unregister_nodes are made more useful if children are
removed recursively. I'll make some changes for v2 to make the change
less far-reaching + better documentation.
Thanks,
Jordan
