On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:23:45 +0100 Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18/06/2020 15:09, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Guillaume, > > > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 18 Jun 2020 > > 15:23:24 +0200: > > > >> Hi Guillaume, > >> > >> Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 18 Jun > >> 2020 13:28:05 +0100: > >> > >>> Please see the bisection report below about a kernel panic. > >>> > >>> Reports aren't automatically sent to the public while we're > >>> trialing new bisection features on kernelci.org but this one > >>> looks valid. > >>> > >>> See the kernel Oops due to a NULL pointer followed by a panic: > >>> > >>> https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20200618/arm/oxnas_v6_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-baylibre/baseline-ox820-cloudengines-pogoplug-series-3.html#L504 > >> > >> Thanks for the report, I will not be able to manage it before Monday, > >> but I'll try to take care of it early next week. > > > > Actually Boris saw the issue, I just updated nand/next, it should be > > part of tomorrow's linux-next. Could you please report if it fixes your > > boot? > > Sure, will check tomorrow. Thanks for the update. > > We may also consider adding the nand/next branch to kernelci.org > and catch issues earlier. We can discuss that separately. If you're testing linux-next that shouldn't help us much (nand/next is pulled in linux-next already), but maybe it's just about making the bisection easier for kernelci (less commits to inspect), in which case that's probably a good idea. You might also want to add mtd/next, spi-nor/next and cfi/next so the entire MTD subsystem gets tested.
