Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile error with 85xx/p1010rdb.c
  • From: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the 4xx tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: error while fetching the hexagon quilt series
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
  • From: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
  • From: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
  • From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile error with 85xx/p1023_rds.c
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the xshm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
  • From: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] HID: wiimote: Select INPUT_FF_MEMLESS
  • From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
  • From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (hid/hid-wiimote)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (kvm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] linux-next:et131x: Revert changes from previous commit
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please include xshm in linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Movement of pinctrl for-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Please include xshm in linux-next
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Movement of pinctrl for-next tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
  • From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
  • From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] linux-next:et131x: Revert changes from previous commit
  • From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch the arm-current and arm trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (staging/vme)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 6 (x86, not SMP)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86, intel_mid: Kconfig select fix
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the arm tree
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the memblock tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the memblock tree with the vhost tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86/intel_mid: Fix the Kconfig for MID selection
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next web page needs updating
  • From: Julie Sullivan <kernelmail.jms@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH pm/linux-next] cgroup_freezer: drop unnecessary freezing() from try_to_freeze_cgroup()
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 28 (mrst)
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 28 (mrst)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 28 (mrst)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 5 (staging/et131x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Please add my tree to linux-next
  • From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound-asoc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] exit: fix writeback build errors
  • From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] exit: fix writeback build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the 4xx tree
  • From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next not booting on snowball
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ERROR: end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
  • From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the 4xx tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 21
  • From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 29 (drm)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 29 (drm)
  • From: Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 29 (drm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH v3] ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the hexagon tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v3] ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] crypto: serpent-sse2 - should select CRYPTO_CRYPTD
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the hexagon tree
  • From: Richard Kuo <rkuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH v3] ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v3] ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] netlabel: Fix build problems when IPv6 is not enabled
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: git tag expiry?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] netlabel: Fix build problems when IPv6 is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] netlabel: Fix build problems when IPv6 is not enabled
  • From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] netlabel: Fix build problems when IPv6 is not enabled
  • From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] netlabel: Fix build problems when IPv6 is not enabled
  • From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 29 (drm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• git tag expiry?
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vhost tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the m68knommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the hexagon tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ore: FIX breakage when MISC_FILESYSTEMS is not set
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 24 (fs/pnfs vs. exofs)
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: (repost) vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• merge conflict resolution for pm-freezer
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 28 (netlabel)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cgroup tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: (repost) vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: (repost) vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ERROR: end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: (repost) vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• (repost) vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ERROR: end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector 0
  • From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 25 (regulator)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the cgroup tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] at91_ether: use gpio_is_valid for phy IRQ line
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the pm tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• vhost tree for linux-next
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 24 (fs/pnfs vs. exofs)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] crypto: serpent-sse2 - should select CRYPTO_CRYPTD
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Fix compile break due to missing arguments to regulator_register
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure of Linus' tree
  • From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] regulator: Fix compile break due to missing arguments to regulator_register
  • From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] crypto: serpent-sse2 - should select CRYPTO_CRYPTD
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure of Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: regulator tree has moved back to kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] netprio_cgroup: Fix build break
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 23 (crypto)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal()
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• regulator tree has moved back to kernel.org
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] netprio_cgroup: Fix build break
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] netprio_cgroup: Fix build break
  • From: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] netprio_cgroup: Fix build break
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (uprobes tree related)
  • From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (uprobes tree related)
  • From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal()
  • From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (uprobes tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (uprobes tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the mips tree
  • From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH linux-next] iwlegacy: debug.c needs export.h
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
  • From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH linux-next] iwlegacy: debug.c needs export.h
  • From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the wireless-next tree
  • From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the wireless-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failure to fetch the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-lpae tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failure to fetch the cpufreq tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failure to fetch the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: eCryptfs tree back on git.kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH UPDATED] dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal()
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal()
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] dmatest: don't use set_freezable_with_signal()
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• eCryptfs tree back on git.kernel.org
  • From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] digsig: fix build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] digsig: fix build errors
  • From: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] debugfs: bugfix: include <linux/io.h> in file.c
  • From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] digsig: fix build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ib_srpt: Make compilation with BUG=n proceed
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ib_srpt: Make compilation with BUG=n proceed
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ib_srpt: Make compilation with BUG=n proceed
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the mips tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 17 (bluetooth)
  • From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 17 (bluetooth)
  • From: Gustavo Padovan <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 17 (bluetooth)
  • From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
  • From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ib_srpt: Make compilation with BUG=n proceed
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ib_srpt: Make compilation with BUG=n proceed
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ib_srpt: Make compilation with BUG=n proceed
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 16 (infiniband: ib_srpt.c)
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 17 (bluetooth)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: slicoss depends on NET
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: slicoss depends on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 17
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: fix more ET131X build errors
  • From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 16 (infiniband: ib_srpt.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mm: Fix alloc_vm_area for noMMU system
  • From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unicore32 tree created on github
  • From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: unicore32 tree created on github
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• unicore32 tree created on github
  • From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: fix more ET131X build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AT91 defconfig
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 15
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for alloc_frozen_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• AT91 defconfig
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for alloc_frozen_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for intel_thermal_interrupt() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New Char/Misc tree to be added to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New Char/Misc tree to be added to linux-next
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New Char/Misc tree to be added to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for alloc_frozen_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• New Char/Misc tree to be added to linux-next
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for intel_thermal_interrupt() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for intel_thermal_interrupt() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree (and warning)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Blackfin.git tree change
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] qnx4fs: Use kmemdup rather than duplicating its implementation
  • From: Anders Larsen <al@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Blackfin.git tree change
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Blackfin.git tree change
  • From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cleanup time
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: missing trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Blackfin.git tree change
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Blackfin.git tree change
  • From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for intel_thermal_interrupt() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the input tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (ata/libata-sff.c)
  • From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kernel/cpu.c: Add right qualifiers for intel_thermal_interrupt() and cpu_hotplug_pm_sync_init()
  • From: "Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c)
  • From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ata: Fix build error in pata_of_platform (NO_IRQ usage)
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ata: Fix build error in pata_of_platform (NO_IRQ usage)
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c)
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (pci/ats.c)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MIPS/sound: DB1200 audio support depends on MIPS arch.
  • From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MIPS/sound: DB1200 audio support depends on MIPS arch.
  • From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] MIPS/sound: DB1200 audio support depends on MIPS arch.
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] MIPS/sound: DB1200 audio support depends on MIPS arch.
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed import of the rr quilt series
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MIPS/sound: DB1200 audio support depends on MIPS arch.
  • From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (build errors summary)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (build errors summary)
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 9 (build errors summary)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: incorrect build fix
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: incorrect build fix
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: incorrect build fix
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: incorrect build fix
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed import of the rr quilt series
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: incorrect build fix
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re:
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [no subject]
  • From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failing to fetch the sysctl tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 5(7) [x86 hpet.c]
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 5(7) [x86/platform/ts5500_adc.c]
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failing to fetch the sysctl tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failing to fetch the acpi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failing to fetch the sysctl tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failing to fetch the acpi tree
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failing to fetch the sysctl tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failing to fetch the acpi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE)
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: scsi: killing requests for dead queue
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: scsi: killing requests for dead queue
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] linux-next: et131x: Fix build error when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: scsi: killing requests for dead queue
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] linux-next: et131x: Fix build error when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP not enabled
  • From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: scsi: killing requests for dead queue
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (staging/et131x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (staging/et131x)
  • From: Mark Einon <mark.einon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (staging/et131x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: et131x depends on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• scsi: killing requests for dead queue
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (agp/intel-gtt.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Luis Henriques <henrix@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Luis Henriques <henrix@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Changed location for arm-lpae/for-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Changed location for arm-lpae/for-next
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvmtool tree with the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the logfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ASoC and regmap trees have moved back to kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: currently missing kernel devel trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the logfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ASoC and regmap trees have moved back to kernel.org
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Luis Henriques <henrix@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the logfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ben Dooks <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: currently missing kernel devel trees
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the watchdog tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tmem tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] ext4: fix printk format warning in page-io
  • From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext3 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (ata/libata-sff.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] ext4: fix printk format warning in page-io
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] platform/X86: fix dell-laptop function prototypes
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: slicoss depends on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the edac tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the edac tree
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the watchdog tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the edac tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Nov 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound tree related)
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (device-mapper and moduleh trees related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the scsi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the moduleh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hwspinlock tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the device-mapper tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the hwspinlock tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the watchdog tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the edac tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the logfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: git tree URL for IEEE 1394 (FireWire) kernel subsystem
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: git tree URL for IEEE 1394 (FireWire) kernel subsystem
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (mfd/ab8500)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• Re: currently missing kernel devel trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
• Re: HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• HSI framework for linux-next
  • From: Carlos Chinea <carlos.chinea@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: currently missing kernel devel trees
  • From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the libata tree with the at91 tree
  • From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch the leds and backlight trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ext4 tree back to kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MMC tree moved back to kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Updated target-pending.git branches for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ext4 tree back to kernel.org
  • From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix build when CONFIG_BUG is not enabled
  • From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• MMC tree moved back to kernel.org
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sound git tree back to kernel.org
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: sound git tree back to kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: currently missing kernel devel trees
  • From: David Teigland <teigland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (target)
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (target)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sound git tree back to kernel.org
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the tree
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (target)
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Updated target-pending.git branches for linux-next
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the xen-two tree
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (sb_edac.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (target)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (pci/ats.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (mfd/ab8500)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kgdb-next temporarily moved to github
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: sound git tree back to kernel.org
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Updated target-pending.git branches for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (agp/intel-gtt.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Updated target-pending.git branches for linux-next
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: currently missing kernel devel trees
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
  • From: Mike Miller <mike.miller@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Myron Stowe <mstowe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree
  • From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree
  • From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>