Hi Rusty, On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:46:36 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:58:17 +1100, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > After merging the rr tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > > produced these warnings: > > > > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function '__check_debug': > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:712:1: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function '__check_audit_header': > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:724:1: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function '__check_lock_policy': > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:732:1: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function '__check_logsyscall': > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:736:1: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function '__check_paranoid_load': > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:747:1: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > security/apparmor/lsm.c: In function '__check_enabled': > > security/apparmor/lsm.c:751:1: warning: return from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > Hmm, I thought the lsm guys had taken the patch for that. > > James said he'd applied it. Repeated below... > > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: apparmor: fix module parameter handling Indeed it has been applied. Unfortunately, I merge the rr tree before the security tree, so that warning appears between the two merges. I will ignore it. Sorry for the noise. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpSkuSDqxPx8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
