On 01/18/2012 05:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20120118:
>
> Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
Building uml on x86_64 gives:
CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/shared/registers.h:9:0,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h:14,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:20,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:13,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/thread_info.h:53,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/time.h:8,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/timex.h:56,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/sched.h:57,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
/next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: error: redefinition of 'regs_return_value'
/next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: note: previous definition of 'regs_return_value' was here
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
