Russell King wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:18:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Kukjin,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the s5p tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/system-reset.h between commit
> > 281c8724c10c ("ARM: restart: Temporary #error to persuade platform
> > maintainers to take the restart changes seriously") from the arm tree
> and
> > commit 08c6fc52956c ("ARM: restart: EXYNOS: use new restart hook") from
> > the s5p tree.
> >
> > The arm tree patch seems to have had the desired affect so I used the
> s5p
> > tree version.
>
> Err, what are the Samsung people playing at, merging the patches that
> they've sent me for merging into their own tree?
>
Russell, no. They will be removed in my tree.
> This is a recipe for breakage, especially as the exynos patch depends
> on previous patches in my tree _and_ patches in my tree depend on that
> patch as well.
>
Yes, you're right. So they should be sent to upstream via arm tree.
> Well, we'll see what we end up with when you do the next linux-next,
> as by then my public tree should be updated with yesterdays work by
> then.
>
> I've a feeling that this coming merge window is going to be a horrible
> mess.
>
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
