On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:21, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 05:45:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Because of the powerpc problems above, I have used the driver-core tree >> from next-20111222 for today. > > Sorry about all of the problems, we tried to fix everything we could, > but your merges and cross-builds found stuff we missed :( > > Kay, care to send me patches to fix this, and all of the other > linux-next-reported problems to me so we can get this resolved this > week? I rather don't want to add error checking to stuff that doesn't do it today. The sysdev stuff never had that forced checks, but the normal device stuff has. I think the force return value check is really a pretty misguided idea in general, and it's up to the caller to do these checks and handle rollbacks, not the driver core, I think. Can't we just remove that forced check? Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
