Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > After merging the s5p tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed badly. The problem is that you have merged into > your tree a version of the driver-core tree that I reported broken on Dec > 28. > Oops, sorry that. > Presumably you merged the driver-core tree to fix up some conflicts I > have reported. Don't do that, please. Either leave them for Linus to > fix up, or do a merge of Linus' tree after he has merged the (hopefully > fixed) driver-core tree during the merge window. Or send him your tree > unmerged with the merged version available for him to use if he wants to. > OK, I see. Firstly, I will rebase my for-next as per your suggestion. As you know, I just wanted to avoid known conflicts with driver-core tree. > I have used the s5p tree from next-20111228 for today. OK. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html