Hi Ben, On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Could you pull XFS updates from > > > > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next > > > > > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3? > > > > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em > > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently > > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.) > > Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep > them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little > flexability WRT what is in for-next. Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called "oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the branches called "for-next" and "master", right? > > > Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"? > > I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see > how it goes, and then re-evaluate. Ah, ok, I see. > > > Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner > > <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx. Should I change that? > > i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them? > > I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me, > and s/xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx/xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx/. It really helps that > you two are in the same timezone. ;) OK, I will sort all this out on Monday. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpaXEm9_woH1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
