On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:31:13 +0400 Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On the specifics of this bug, I verified this config compiles okay in > your tree + my patches at the day I last sent them. I also verified it > breaks on the tree today. > > The reason seems to be that some other patch tweaked with the header > files in an unrelated patch, and the static_branch definition that was > getting to us in sock.h, is no longer getting there. > > Including it explicitly fixes it here. I will again pass through a > battery of randconfigs on my own, and send you a fix. Which is one of the reasons we have Rule 1 in Documentation/SubmitChecklist: 1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares that facility. Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones that you use. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpbb8hBOkPji.pgp
Description: PGP signature
