Hi all, On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:52:42 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/21/2011 03:35 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:58 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 12/21/2011 12:42 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > >>> Hi Randy, > >>> > >>> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>>> On 12/20/2011 08:39 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > >>>>> Hi Randy, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>>>>> On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Changes since 20111216: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> (not new today, just not reported earlier) > >>>>> John applied my fix for this one. It should be fixed now. > >>>> > >>>> Hi Samuel, > >>>> > >>>> Is this supposed to be fixed in linux-next? > >>>> It still fails today (linux-next 20111221). > >>> Do you have a .config for me to look at ? > >> > >> Sure, one of several that failed is attached. > > Thanks, I just tried this one and it seems to work fine. What's your > > toolchain ? > > I'm using: gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-4) > > I'm using: > > gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 4.5.2 > > so maybe it is something that has been fixed in gcc... > > Thanks for checking the config. Well, it would be interesting to know what tree Samuel was testing, because the fix commit was *not* in next-20111221 due to another error in the wireless-next tree ... That fix *should* be in today's linux-next since the fix for the other build problem is there. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpPykizdzfj8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
