Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I thought it had been...?  Need to investigate (as baby permits...)

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hi again,
>
>On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
><sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>> >
>> > On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include
><asm/asm-offsets.h>
>> > >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree.  These warnings may
>have been
>> > >> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the
>flood.
>> > >>
>> > > 
>> > > hpa,
>> > > 
>> > > Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that
>into
>> > > asm/ftrace.h instead?
>> > 
>> > Yes (on both accounts).  It was part of the syscall changes; I'll
>move
>> > the include.
>> 
>> Ping?
>
>Can we please have this fixed ...
>-- 
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux