On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:37 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - for_each_set_bit_cont(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp, > > + for_each_set_bit_from(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp, > > That looks about right, yes. Not sure what the best way to handle this > is, perhaps maintain _cont() for a while? I don't think that will be needed - for_each_set_bit_cont() only had two callers, both in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
