On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:08:10PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > - for_each_set_bit_cont(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp, > > > + for_each_set_bit_from(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp, > > That looks about right, yes. Not sure what the best way to handle this > > is, perhaps maintain _cont() for a while? > I don't think that will be needed - for_each_set_bit_cont() only had > two callers, both in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c. Well, by "a while" I mostly mean "until after the merge window when the new API is available".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
