On 02/26/2012 10:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> I applied the following fix up patch.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 27 Feb
> 2012 17:12:00 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] percpu: fix for removal of
> percpu_xxx function
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1
> insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h index e7f68b4..b6a2a1c 100644 ---
> a/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h +++
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static inline
> void __user *arch_compat_alloc_user_space(long len) sp =
> task_pt_regs(current)->sp; } else { /* -128 for the x32 ABI redzone
> */ - sp = percpu_read(old_rsp) - 128; + sp =
> __this_cpu_read(old_rsp) - 128; }
>
> return (void __user *)round_down(sp - len, 16);
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
