RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
> 
> > > Ok, now reverted, what a mess...
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > OK, I have just posted the ramster v5 patchset which applies against
> > linux-3.2.  I've test-built it against linux-next... it only gets
> > the normal minor merge conflicts for adding a line to
> > drivers/staging/Makefile and Kconfig.
> 
> Please resend after fixing that conflict, as it would require me to edit
> it by hand in order to apply this.  As you have already redone the
> patch, there's no reason I should have to do this, right?

OK.  I'm not quite sure how to generate a patchset or a
git commit-set that applies cleanly against two different
trees (3.2 and linux-next), but I guess common sense should
tell me that, since the patches have to go through staging-next
first and you are applying patches rather than git-pull'ing,
staging-next should be my preferred choice for a base.

Do you want me to resend all 6 patches?  The only patch
affected is patch 6 of 6.  All others apply cleanly.
Let me know and I will resend one or all tomorrow.

Sorry for the noise/hassle, but this is a learning process...

Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux