On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:02 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On 12-02-27 10:24 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 15:51 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> Upstream commit e66eed651fd18a961f11cda62f3b5286c8cc4f9f > >> > >> "list: remove prefetching from regular list iterators" > >> > >> removed <linux/prefetch.h> from <linux/list.h> very early in the > >> v3.0 dev cycle (v2.6.39-2-ge66eed6), thereby causing build failures > >> when it exposed the implicit prefetch users in parisc. > > > > I already have this in my internal patch queue: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-parisc&m=132825467010662 > > Is this in a different queue than what is in linux next? Yes, sorry ... I hadn't got around to building the parisc tree for the current version. I've done that now. > It would be nice to see such build fixes get into linux-next > ASAP, so folks doing multi-arch coverage builds on their work > can know if they've introduced a regression. At the moment, > the parisc builds in linux-next have been worthless for over > six months, and I'm sure I'm not the 1st one to waste time > "re-solving" old bugs like this. So if you recheck with the next build of linux-next, they should all be there (modulo the cross compile patch which is still under discussion). James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
