On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 03:43, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Due to the nature of the commits I've been making lately, when I see
> a fail in linux-next, I have to wonder if I somehow caused it by a
> header shuffle. After pouring over the kisskb linux-next results,
> I realized that I can't be the only one doing this, and that a triage
> summary of the linux-next fails should in theory be useful to a
> bunch of people doing similar to what I do.
Indeed. Unfortunately I don't have the bandwidth to do daily regression
summaries for linux-next, like I do for Linus' releases.
I haven't uploaded my scripts to kernel.org after the resurrection,
but you may be able to get linux-log-diff.pl and linux-log-summary.pl
from an old mirror.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
