Hi Daniel,
See my replies inline.
Hi
I had a quick look with gitweb. The following change causes the problem, comments inline:
From: Armando Visconti<armando.visconti@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:51:37 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: Input: usbtouchscreen - add support for Data Modul EasyTouch TP 72037
X-Git-Tag: next-20120227~55^2~4
X-Git-Url:
http://git.kernel.org/gitweb.cgi?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fnext%2Flinux-next.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=e6307aa07c5a11022f0ccee19a8ff0ba033eeb93
Input: usbtouchscreen - add support for Data Modul EasyTouch TP 72037
The Data Modul TP 72037 EasyTouch controller is derived from EGALAX
controller and is capable of detecting dual contacts. Packets can be 5
bytes or 10 bytes long, depending whether one or two contacts are
detected. Format is same as EGALAX touch controller, but with x and y
coordinates inverted.
Signed-off-by: Armando Visconti<armando.visconti@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar<viresh.kumar@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov<dtor@xxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
index 2b21a70..2acf16f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
@@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_USB_COMPOSITE
- JASTEC USB Touch Controller/DigiTech DTR-02U
- Zytronic controllers
- Elo TouchSystems 2700 IntelliTouch
+ - EasyTouch USB Touch Controller from Data Modul
Have a look at<http://linux.chapter7.ch/touchkit/> for
a usage description and the required user-space stuff.
@@ -711,6 +712,14 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_USB_NEXIO
bool "NEXIO/iNexio device support" if EXPERT
depends on TOUCHSCREEN_USB_COMPOSITE
+config TOUCHSCREEN_USB_EASYTOUCH
+ default y
+ bool "EasyTouch USB Touch controller device support" if EMBEDDED
+ depends on TOUCHSCREEN_USB_COMPOSITE
+ help
+ Say Y here if you have a EasyTouch USB Touch controller device support.
+ If unsure, say N.
+
config TOUCHSCREEN_TOUCHIT213
tristate "Sahara TouchIT-213 touchscreen"
select SERIO
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
index 9dbd8b4..5813089 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
* - Zytronic capacitive touchscreen
* - NEXIO/iNexio
* - Elo TouchSystems 2700 IntelliTouch
+ * - EasyTouch USB Dual/Multi touch controller from Data Modul
*
* Copyright (C) 2004-2007 by Daniel Ritz<daniel.ritz@xxxxxx>
* Copyright (C) by Todd E. Johnson (mtouchusb.c)
@@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ enum {
DEVTYPE_TC45USB,
DEVTYPE_NEXIO,
DEVTYPE_ELO,
+ DEVTYPE_ETOUCH,
};
#define USB_DEVICE_HID_CLASS(vend, prod) \
@@ -245,6 +247,10 @@ static const struct usb_device_id usbtouch_devices[] = {
{USB_DEVICE(0x04e7, 0x0020), .driver_info = DEVTYPE_ELO},
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_EASYTOUCH
+ {USB_DEVICE(0x7374, 0x0001), .driver_info = DEVTYPE_ETOUCH},
+#endif
+
{}
};
@@ -326,6 +332,47 @@ static int egalax_get_pkt_len(unsigned char *buf, int len)
}
#endif
+/*****************************************************************************
+ * EasyTouch part
+ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_EASYTOUCH
here, some lines are missing:
#ifndef MULTI_PACKET
#define MULTI_PACKET
#endif
adding these will fix the compile error.
Correct.
Thanks for pointing out this stupid mistake...
We'll change it.
+
+#define EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_MASK 0xFE
+#define EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_REPT 0x80
+#define EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_REPT2 0xB0
+#define EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_DIAG 0x0A
The names here are wrong. The prefix EGALAX_ is only for eGalax controllers and some
of them are already defined in the eGalax part of the driver. This will re-define them
which is not good. Please use ETOUCH_... instead.
Yes, it makes sense.
+
+static int etouch_read_data(struct usbtouch_usb *dev, unsigned char *pkt)
+{
+ if ((pkt[0]& EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_MASK) != EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_REPT&&
+ (pkt[0]& EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_MASK) != EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_REPT2)
+ return 0;
+
+ dev->x = ((pkt[1]& 0x1F)<< 7) | (pkt[2]& 0x7F);
+ dev->y = ((pkt[3]& 0x1F)<< 7) | (pkt[4]& 0x7F);
+ dev->touch = pkt[0]& 0x01;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int etouch_get_pkt_len(unsigned char *buf, int len)
+{
+ switch (buf[0]& EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_MASK) {
+ case EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_REPT:
+ case EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_REPT2:
+ return 5;
The description states that packets can be 10 bytes long, but this case is not
handled here. How does the 10 byte packet look like? Is it two five byte packets?
How is the format? What is contained in the other 5 bytes?
It is handled by usbtouch_process_multi() calling the packet processing
twice. The format is '5 bytes' for a single contact and 10 bytes (5 + 5)
for dual contact.
In the 10 bytes packet the info for first contact starts with 0x80 as
for a normal EGALAX, while the info for the second contact starts with
a 0xB0.
So, in case of 10 bytes packet, usbtouch_process_multi() will call the
processing routines twice.
Anyway: if it's two 5 byte packets, shouldn't the data from both packets be used
for _one_ input event for increased accuracy or something?
If it's not two 5 byte packets, the function must return 10 for a 10 byte packet.
Otherwise the driver will have to sync for each packet (which works fine but is slower).
Initially I have done exactly the way you are suggesting.
But then, it seemed to me more appropriate to reuse the capability of
the usbtouch_process_multi() to process more data in the same packet.
And pls note that I'm not using MT protocol to send the info up to the
input device. The contacts info are sent as separate events.
So, what to do here?
+
+ case EGALAX_PKT_TYPE_DIAG:
+ if (len< 2)
+ return -1;
+
+ return buf[1] + 2;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
/*****************************************************************************
* PanJit Part
@@ -1175,6 +1222,18 @@ static struct usbtouch_device_info usbtouch_dev_info[] = {
.exit = nexio_exit,
},
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_USB_EASYTOUCH
+ [DEVTYPE_ETOUCH] = {
+ .min_xc = 0x0,
+ .max_xc = 0x07ff,
+ .min_yc = 0x0,
+ .max_yc = 0x07ff,
+ .rept_size = 16,
+ .process_pkt = usbtouch_process_multi,
+ .get_pkt_len = etouch_get_pkt_len,
+ .read_data = etouch_read_data,
+ },
+#endif
};
Cheers
-daniel
Thanks for reviewing.
Rgds,
Arm
--
-- "Every step appears to be the unavoidable consequence of the
-- preceding one." (A. Einstein)
--
Armando Visconti Mobile: (+39) 346 8879146
Senior SW Engineer Fax: (+39) 02 93519290
CPG Work: (+39) 02 93519683
Computer System Division e-mail: armando.visconti@xxxxxx
ST Microelectronics TINA: 051 4683
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
