On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 05:33:40PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:31:39PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:48:06PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> >> Hi Greg,
> >> >>
> >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> >> >> drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c between commit
> >> >> 5a63177a6967 ("staging: tidspbridge: fix bridge_open memory leaks") from
> >> >> Linus' tree and commit 518761dba127 ("staging: tidspbridge: remove unused
> >> >> header") from the staging tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, I'll try to fix this up with a merge tomorrow to get this in
> >> > sync.
> >>
> >> 5a63177a6967 ("staging: tidspbridge: fix bridge_open memory leaks")
> >> was accidentally reverted with the merge of staging-3.3-rc3 on
> >> staging-next branch, the same patch still applies since the previous
> >> patch touching this code moves it some lines above.
> >
> > Ok, so what should I do here? What patch should I apply to the
> > staging-next tree? Just reapply 5a63177a6967?
>
> Yes, reapplying 5a63177a6967 worked for me.
Ok, thanks, now done.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
