Postgres Performance Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: SSD performance
- Re: SSD performance
- Re: SSD performance
- Re: SSD performance
- Re: SSD performance
- Re: SSD performance
- Re: SSD performance
- SSD performance
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: caching indexes and pages?
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: caching indexes and pages?
- Re: caching indexes and pages?
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: Question about clustering indexes and restores
- From: Harold A. Giménez Ch.
- Re: Question about clustering indexes and restores
- Question about clustering indexes and restores
- From: Harold A. Giménez Ch.
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: linux, memory (mis)accounting/reporting, and the planner/optimizer
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: caching written values?
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: linux, memory (mis)accounting/reporting, and the planner/optimizer
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Re: Slow HashAggregate : How to optimize ?
- postgresql 8.3 tps rate
- Slow HashAggregate : How to optimize ?
- Re: caching written values?
- Re: caching indexes and pages?
- Re: caching written values?
- Re: caching written values?
- Re: caching written values?
- Re: caching written values?
- caching written values?
- Re: caching indexes and pages?
- Re: caching indexes and pages?
- caching indexes and pages?
- Re: linux, memory (mis)accounting/reporting, and the planner/optimizer
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: linux, memory (mis)accounting/reporting, and the planner/optimizer
- linux, memory (mis)accounting/reporting, and the planner/optimizer
- Re: Interesting query plan change linked to the LIMIT parameter
- Re: Interesting query plan change linked to the LIMIT parameter
- Interesting query plan change linked to the LIMIT parameter
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Query running long - cost estimation question...
- test
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: left join + case - how is it processed?
- left join + case - how is it processed?
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Cost of INSERT rules
- Re: row-specific conditions possible?
- row-specific conditions possible?
- Re: index
- From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: index
- index
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: strange index behaviour with different statistics target
- Re: strange index behaviour with different statistics target
- Re: strange index behaviour with different statistics target
- Re: strange index behaviour with different statistics target
- strange index behaviour with different statistics target
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Slow insert performace, 8.3 Wal related?
- Re: slow query
- Re: slow query
- Re: slow query
- Re: slow query
- Re: slow query
- slow query
- Re: multicolumn indexes still efficient if not fully stressed?
- Re: multicolumn indexes still efficient if not fully stressed?
- Re: multicolumn indexes still efficient if not fully stressed?
- Re: multicolumn indexes still efficient if not fullystressed?
- multicolumn indexes still efficient if not fully stressed?
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: db server load
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: block device benchmarking
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: block device benchmarking
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: block device benchmarking
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- block device benchmarking
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?
- Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?
- Re: Sl_log_1 and sl_log_2 not getting truncated.
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: Fwd: Casting issue!!
- Re: Fwd: Casting issue!!
- Re: Fwd: Casting issue!!
- Fwd: Casting issue!!
- Sl_log_1 and sl_log_2 not getting truncated.
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: Bgwriter and pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_clean aspects
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: Memory Allocation (8 GB shared buffer limit on Ubuntu Hardy)
- Re: Memory Allocation (8 GB shared buffer limit on Ubuntu Hardy)
- Re: Memory Allocation (8 GB shared buffer limit on Ubuntu Hardy)
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: failure notice
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
- Re: bad selectivity estimates for CASE
- Re: bad selectivity estimates for CASE
- Re: Bgwriter and pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_clean aspects
- Re: bad selectivity estimates for CASE
- bad selectivity estimates for CASE
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Poor plan choice in prepared statement
- Re: Big index sizes
- Re: perform 1 check vs exception when unique_violation
- Re: Big index sizes
- perform 1 check vs exception when unique_violation
- Re: Big index sizes
- Big index sizes
- Re: Slow table update - SOLVED!
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: Slow table update
- Re: Slow table update
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: Bgwriter and pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_clean aspects
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: Slow table update
- Bgwriter and pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_clean aspects
- Re: How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- Re: Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Troubles dumping a very large table.
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
- Re: How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- Re: How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- Re: How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- Re: How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- How to "unique-ify" HUGE table?
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: temp_tablespaces and RAID
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- temp_tablespaces and RAID
- Re: [ADMIN] rebellious pg stats collector (reopened case)
- Re: [ADMIN] rebellious pg stats collector (reopened case)
- Re: [ADMIN] rebellious pg stats collector (reopened case)
- Re: Slow table update
- Re: Slow table update
- Re: Slow table update
- Re: Slow table update
- Re: Slow table update
- Slow table update
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle
- Query planner plus partitions equals very bad plans, again
- Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: PostgreSQL vs Oracle
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle
- Re: dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- dbt-2 tuning results with postgresql-8.3.5
- Re: pg_restore : out of memory
- Re: pg_restore : out of memory
- Re: Fwd: Not so simple query and a half million loop
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: insert and Update slow after implementing slony.
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- Re: measure database contention
- insert and Update slow after implementing slony.
- measure database contention
- Re: filesystems benchmark
- Re: filesystems benchmark
- filesystems benchmark
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: db server load
- db server load
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Degenerate Performance Problem
- Degenerate Performance Problem
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- query plan with index having a btrim is different for strings of different length
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: file system and raid performance
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: file system and raid performance
- Re: file system and raid performance
- Re: file system and raid performance
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: file system and raid performance
- From: M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Need help with 8.4 Performance Testing
- Re: file system and raid performance
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Re: Context switch storms
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Trigger function, bad performance
- pg_restore : out of memory
- Trigger function, bad performance
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: How to profile an "SQL script"?
- Re: How to profile an "SQL script"?
- Re: How to profile an "SQL script"?
- How to profile an "SQL script"?
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: Postgres using more memory than it should
- Postgres using more memory than it should
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Fwd: Not so simple query and a half million loop
- From: Daniel Cristian Cruz
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- Re: analyzing intermediate query
- analyzing intermediate query
- Re: Sort causes system to freeze
- Re: Sort causes system to freeze
- Re: Sort causes system to freeze
- Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
- Context switch storms
- Re: Sort causes system to freeze
- Sort causes system to freeze
- Re: Query optimization
- Seq scan over 3.3 millions of rows instead of using date and pattern indexes
- Re: Query optimization
- Query optimization
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Increasing GROUP BY CHAR columns speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Re: Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Re: Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Re: Partition table query performance
- Re: many to many performance
- Re: performance tuning queries
- Re: performance tuning queries
- Re: performance tuning queries
- performance tuning queries
- Re: Partition table query performance
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Memory Allocation
- Memory Allocation
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- many to many performance
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: many to many performance
- many to many performance
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Partition table query performance
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Re: Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Deteriorating performance when loading large objects
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Re: limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Re: limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Monitoring buffercache...
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Increasing pattern index query speed
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- limit clause produces wrong query plan
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single keyindex access
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Increasing pattern index query speed
- seq scan over 3.3 million rows instead of single key index access
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Re: Perc 3 DC
- Perc 3 DC
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Performance and IN clauses
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Very Urgent : Sequences Problem
- Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds
- Re: Very Urgent : Sequences Problem
- Re: Very Urgent : Sequences Problem
- Re: Very Urgent : Sequences Problem
- Very Urgent : Sequences Problem
- Re: PostgreSQL NOT IN performance
- Re: PostgreSQL NOT IN performance
- Re: PostgreSQL NOT IN performance
- Re: PostgreSQL NOT IN performance
- Re: PostgreSQL NOT IN performance
- From: DANIEL CRISTIAN CRUZ
- PostgreSQL NOT IN performance
- Re: Performance and IN clauses
- Re: Performance and IN clauses
- Re: Performance and IN clauses
- Re: Performance and IN clauses
- Performance and IN clauses
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Bad performance on simple query
- Bad performance on simple query
- Re: Improve Seq scan performance
- Re: PostgreSQL OR performance
- Re: Performance Question
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: Improve Seq scan performance
- Re: PostgreSQL OR performance
- Re: PostgreSQL OR performance
- Re: PostgreSQL OR performance
- Re: Difference in query plan
- Re: Difference in query plan
- Re: Difference in query plan
- Difference in query plan
- Re: crosstab speed
- Re: crosstab speed
- crosstab speed
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Performance Question
- Slow SQL query (14-15 seconds)
- Re: Performance Question
- Re: Performance Question
- Re: Using index for IS NULL query
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: Disk usage question
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: slow full table update
- Disk usage question
- Re: Performance Question
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib wheredatecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: Performance Question
- Increasing select max(datecol) from bilkaib where datecol<=date'2008-11-01' and (cr='00' or db='00') speed
- Re: Performance Question
- Re: Performance Question
- Re: slow full table update
- Performance Question
- Re: slow full table update
- Re: Index usage with sub select or outer joins
- Re: Index usage with sub select or inner joins
- Index usage with sub select or inner joins
- Re: Using index for IS NULL query
- Re: Oddity with view (now with test case)
- Re: Using index for IS NULL query
[Index of Archives]
[Postgresql General]
[Postgresql PHP]
[PHP Home]
[PHP on Windows]
[Yosemite]