> Is that how it works for an index as well? I just found out that I have an > index that is 35GB, and the table is 85GB. ( I will look into the index, it > works fine, but an index that is almost one third of the size of the table, > seems a little bit strange. ) > So if it works the same way and the index uses a B-tree, I assume it only > loads the pages that contains the subpart of the index that are relevant, is > this correct? Yes. See shared_buffers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/runtime-config-resource.html ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
