Linux Sparse
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] struct_union_enum_specifier: set MOD_TOPLEVEL if toplevel(sym->scope)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] struct_union_enum_specifier: set MOD_TOPLEVEL if toplevel(sym->scope)
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] struct_union_enum_specifier: set MOD_TOPLEVEL if toplevel(sym->scope)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] dissect: enforce MOD_TOPLEVEL if SYM_STRUCT was not defined
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] dissect: fix sym_is_local(SYM_STRUCT/UNION/ENUM)
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] struct_union_enum_specifier: set MOD_TOPLEVEL if toplevel(sym->scope)
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: introduce sym_is_local() for reporter
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] dissect: kill no_member()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] dissect: don't set ->ident = '?' in no_member()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: use show_ident() to print dctx->ident
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: introduce sym_is_local() for reporter
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smatch/sparse complaints on static assertion
- From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smatch/sparse complaints on static assertion
- From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: introduce sym_is_local() for reporter
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smatch/sparse complaints on static assertion
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: smatch/sparse complaints on static assertion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- smatch/sparse complaints on static assertion
- From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: move __sparse() callsite from test-dissect.c to dissect.c
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: introduce sym_is_local() for reporter
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] dissect: set sym->kind for reporter
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] dissect: enforce sym->kind='f' when it looks like a function call
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] dissect: set sym->kind for reporter
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] do the tree inlining during expansion phase
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: introduce dissect_ctx
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: kill return_type
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: change do_symbol(SYM_FN) to check base_type->stmt != NULL
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: introduce dissect_ctx
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH bpf] bpf: Improve bucket_log calculation logic
- From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix type compatibility of _Atomic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: introduce dissect_ctx
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: introduce dissect_ctx
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse problem with Linux kernel v5.5
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] dissect: minor fixes/cleanups
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: introduce reporter->r_memdef()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] dissect: turn mk_name() into deanon()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] dissect: disallow NULL pointers in struct reporter
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] dissect: change deanon() to handle the !node case
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] dissect: don't report anonymous members in initializers
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] dissect: minor fixes/cleanups
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PATCH: sparse_add_switch() for backends to register new switches into main parsing table
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PATCH: sparse_add_switch() for backends to register new switches into main parsing table
- From: Xan Phung <xan.phung@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PATCH: sparse_add_switch() for backends to register new switches into main parsing table
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- PATCH: sparse_add_switch() for backends to register new switches into main parsing table
- From: Xan Phung <xan.phung@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PATCH: domtree_build() creates extraneous bb->doms entries
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PATCH: domtree_build() creates extraneous bb->doms entries
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] predefine "i386" if needed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] predefine "i386" if needed
- From: john.levon@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] correct sparcv9 defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] correct sparcv9 defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add necessary defined for sunos-derived systems
- From: john.levon@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] pre-define __unix__ and friends
- From: john.levon@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] define __PRAGMA_REDEFINE_EXTNAME
- From: john.levon@xxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH] correct sparcv9 defines
- From: john.levon@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] show_parse: avoid null pointer dereference in do_show_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] show_parse: avoid null pointer dereference in do_show_type()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] locking/refcount: add sparse annotations to dec-and-lock functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ptrlist: fix typos
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/10] arch: arch_mach is not needed anymore
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/10] arch: use arch_target for INT128's predefine
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/10] arch: move target-specific predefines to the target files.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/10] arch: move cmodel predefines to the target files.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/10] arch: move arch-specificities to their own files
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/10] arch: move handle_arch_finalize() into target_init()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/10] arch: use an arch-specific default for -msize-long
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/10] arch: move parsing of --arch=<ARCH> to target.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/10] cgcc: rename 'ppc64+{be,le}' to 'ppc64{be,le}'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/10] cgcc: add support for riscv32
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/10] move arch specificities in their own files
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] improve diagnostic message about wrong redeclaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] improve diagnostic message about wrong redeclaration
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] improve diagnostic message about wrong redeclaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] improve diagnostic message about wrong redeclaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] typeof: extract examine_typeof() from examine_symbol_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] improve diagnostic message about wrong redeclaration
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] typeof: do not let classify_type() do its own SYM_TYPEOF expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] typeof: extract examine_typeof() from examine_symbol_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] typeof: extract examine_typeof() from examine_symbol_type()
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] typeof: do not let classify_type() do its own SYM_TYPEOF expansion
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] improve diagnostic message about wrong redeclaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] typeof: avoid using is_bitfield_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] typeof: extract examine_typeof() from examine_symbol_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] typeof: do not let classify_type() do its own SYM_TYPEOF expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] mark strings as examined & evaluated
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] tidy-up of typeof expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] constexpr: mark __builtin_choose_expr() as constexpr
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix testcase with non-constant initializer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/17] constant expansion of strings
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/17] RFC: allow expansion of accessed constants if 'static const'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/17] fix cost of dereference of symbols with complex type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/17] fix simplify_loads() when doing type punning
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/17] fix expansion of initializer (default)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/17] fix expansion of initializer (mismatching type)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/17] fix expansion of initializer (mismatching size)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/17] degenerated arrays & functions are addressable too
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/17] fix addressability marking in evaluate_addressof()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/17] extract mark_addressable() from evaluate_addressof().
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/17] add test for constant expansion of complex initializer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/17] add test for dereference cost of symbol with complex type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/17] add test for union cast
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/17] add testcase for addressability of 'complex' symbols
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/17] add testcase for addressability of degenerated symbol
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/17] add testcase for expansion of default initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/17] split testcases for type punning & constant initializer expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/17] improve expansion of constant symbols
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix premature examination of dereferenced object
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] improve diagnostic messages concerning bitfields
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] improve diagnostic messages concerning bitfields
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] bitfield: display the bitfield name in error messages
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] bitfield: keep the bitfield ident
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] bitfield: oversized bitfields are errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] bitfield: don't warn twice on invalid width
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] bitfield: add testcases for invalid bitfield width
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] improve diagnostic messages concerning bitfields
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [DRAFT] add support for GCC's __auto_type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [DRAFT] add support for GCC's __auto_type
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [DRAFT] add support for GCC's __auto_type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] reorganize the __STDC_VERSION__/__STRICT_ANSI__ switch statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] teach sparse about C17
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] simplify definition of __STRICT_ANSI__
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] teach sparse about C17
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] simplify definition of __STRICT_ANSI__
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] reorganize the __STDC_VERSION__/__STRICT_ANSI__ switch statement
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] cgcc: only define __CYGWIN32__ for -m32 builds
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] cgcc: only define __CYGWIN32__ for -m32 builds
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove redundant degenerate() in compatible_assignment_types()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] testsuite: avoid standard includes in the tests
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] teach sparse about C17
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] separate definition of __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ and friends from C11
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] reorganize the __STDC_VERSION__/__STRICT_ANSI__ switch statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] simplify definition of __STRICT_ANSI__
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] allow to test the standard version outside of lib.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] alt definition for STANDARD_GNU89 & friends
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] simplify initialization of Wdeclarationafterstatement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/7] add support for '-std=c17'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cgcc: fix definition of 'linux' macro
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] cgcc: only define __CYGWIN32__ for -m32 builds
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] cgcc: only define __CYGWIN32__ for -m32 builds
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cgcc: fix definition of 'linux' macro
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] arch: use a variable for the OS
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] arch: keep BSD & Darwin specifics with i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] arch: add missing predefines for PPC
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] arch: add missing predfines: __amd64 & __amd64__
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] arch: sparc32 on SunOS/Solaris uses 128-bit long doubles
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] arch: use a variable for the OS
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] arch: char32_t should be the same as uint32_t, not uint
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] arch: keep BSD & Darwin specifics with i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] arch: simplify i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] cgcc: add support for riscv64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] arch: fix wchar_t & wint_t for openbsd
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] arch: add missing predefines for PPC
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] arch: add missing predfines: __amd64 & __amd64__
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] More arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/12] arch: add note for 128-bit long double on mips64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/12] arch: sparc32 on SunOS/Solaris uses 128-bit long doubles
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/12] arch: fix wchar_t & wint_t on SunOS/Solaris
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/12] arch: use a variable for the OS
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/12] arch: add predefines for INT128 only on supported archs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/12] arch: (almost) all platforms simply use int for int32
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/12] arch: char32_t should be the same as uint32_t, not uint
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/12] arch: remove impossible cases with 64-bit arch not being lp64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/12] arch: do not needlessly set bitness on 32-bit archs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/12] arch: keep BSD & Darwin specifics with i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/12] arch: simplify i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/12] arch: fix the signedness of plain chars
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/12] Miscellaneous arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] spec: replace lllong_ctype by int128_ctype
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] spec: replace lllong_ctype by int128_ctype
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cgcc: filter-out -msize-long & -msize-llp64
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] let function definition inherit prototype attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] spec: replace lllong_ctype by int128_ctype
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cgcc: filter-out -msize-long & -msize-llp64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] let function definition inherit prototype attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] let function definition inherit prototype attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] allow 'static' forward declaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] let function definition inherit prototype attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] propagate function modifiers only to functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] add tests for function attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] fix propagation of function attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] propagate function modifiers only to functions
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] allow omitted function attribute in definition
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] propagate function modifiers only to functions
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] add tests for function attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] fix propagation of function attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] propagate function modifiers only to functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] allow omitted function attribute in definition
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] fix assignment check with function attribute
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] fix assignment: pointer to __pure/__noreturn function to void *
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] add tests for function attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] fix propagation of function attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] function attributes apply to the function declaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] function attributes apply to the function declaration
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] give a correct position to mode
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] cgcc: let cygwin use -fshort-wchar
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] arch: teach sparse about -fshort-wchar
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] arch: keep cygwin specifics with i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] make wchar_t be correct on Cygwin via cgcc
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] arch: remove impossible cases with 64-bit arch not being lp64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] arch: char32_t should be the same as uint32_t, not uint
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] arch: arm uses long for int32_t
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] arch: ppc32 has 64-bit long double
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] arch: do not needlessly set bitness on 32-bit archs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] arch: simplify i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] arch: keep BSD & Darwin specifics with i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] arch: fix the signedness of plain chars
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/8] Miscellaneous arch specific fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] process MOD_EXT_VISIBLE like other MOD_FUN_ATTRs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] function attributes apply to the function declaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
- From: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Add -Wexternal-function-has-definition
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH] lib.c: fix spelling of _BIG_ENDIAN
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Add -Wexternal-function-has-definition
- From: John Levon <john.levon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PATCH] lib.c: fix spelling of _BIG_ENDIAN
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] spec: get rid of all specifier MOD_XXX
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] spec: KW_SHORT is not needed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] spec: make ctype_declare[] more readable
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] spec: KW_LONG is not needed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] spec: s/size/rank/
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] types: use llong instead of longlong, ldouble for ...
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] spec: improve parsing of __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] spec: add '.class = CInt'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] spec: types[] is indexed by the specifier class
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] spec: process chars like other integer types
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/9] simplify parsing of specifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] arch: do not unneedlessly set bitness on 32-bit archs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] arch: remove impossible case with mips64 not being lp64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] arch: keep cygwin specifics with i386/x86-64 specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] cleanup arch-specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arch: fix the signedness of plain chars
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] typeof: add a test for unexaminated typeof
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] typeof: fix up comment in examine_pointer_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] typeof: add a test for unexaminated typeof
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] typeof: fix up comment in examine_pointer_type()
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] typeof: examine it at show-time
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] typeof: fix up comment in examine_pointer_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] clarify evaluation of SYM_TYPEOF
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] typeof: add a test for unexaminated typeof
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] show-type: add a test program to test do_show_type() & friends
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] cgcc: let sparse define _BIG_ENDIAN
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] cgcc: small simplifications
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] cgcc: remove _STRING_ARCH_unaligned
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: latest printf code
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] remove unneeded MOD_TYPE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] remove unneeded MOD_TYPE
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] remove unneeded MOD_TYPE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] remove unused SYM_TYPEDEF
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] remove unused SYM_MEMBER
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] remove unused KW_STATEMENT
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] remove unused or unneeded constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- latest printf code
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] testsuite: clarify testsuite report
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] improve cross-compiling usage
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] cgcc: removed unneeded predefines for integers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] cgcc: specify the arch via --arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/6] cgcc: removed unneeded predefines for integers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] arch: add an option to specify the desired arch: --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/6] cgcc: specify the arch via --arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/6] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] arch: change the arch when changing -m32/64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/6] change the arch when changing -m32/64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] arch: add support for s390 (ILP32)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] arch: reorder MACH_XXX defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/6] add support for s390 (ILP32)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] arch: add predefine for __mips__
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/6] reorder MACH_XXX defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/6] improve cross-compiling usage
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/8] riscv: ensure RISC-V C model definitions are passed to static analyzers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] options: allow to specify the desired arch with --arch=<arch>
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] options: add support for -mcmodel
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] options: add support for -fpic, -fPIC, -fpie & -fPIE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [SPARSE PATCH 0/2] add support for -mcmodel & -f{pic,PIC,pie,PIE}
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- detecting misuse of of_get_property
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V2] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler*.h: Add '__' prefix and suffix to all __attribute__ #defines
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: follow-up on printf formatting
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: follow-up on printf formatting
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] validation: ignore temporary ~ files
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] validation: ignore temporary ~ files
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse: __pure declaration only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse: __pure declaration only
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse: __pure declaration only
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse issue buulding kernel/signal.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- sparse issue buulding kernel/signal.c
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sparse v0.6.1
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse warnings on undeclared asmlinkage
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- sparse warnings on undeclared asmlinkage
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] "graph" segfaults on top-level asm
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] "graph" segfaults on top-level asm
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Sparse v0.6.1-rc2 is now out.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Sparse v0.6.1-rc2 is now out.
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "graph" (v0.6.1-rc2) segfaults on top-level asm
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Sparse v0.6.1-rc2 is now out.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Sparse v0.6.1-rc2 is now out.
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Sparse v0.6.1-rc2 is now out.
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: possible incorrect warning in arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- "graph" (v0.6.1-rc2) segfaults on top-level asm
- From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
- possible incorrect warning in arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Sparse v0.6.1-rc2 is now out.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: Add back rule to make (touch) check_list_local.h
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: Add back rule to make (touch) check_list_local.h
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] Makefile: Add back rule to make (touch) check_list_local.h
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] expand more builtins like __builtin_ffs()
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] expand more builtins like __builtin_ffs()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm: warn on invalid empty constraints
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] make 'directive in argument list' clearer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] void-cond: allow void in conditional expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with bit field sizes
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conditional operator ?: usage (Linux kernel)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conditional operator ?: usage (Linux kernel)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conditional operator ?: usage (Linux kernel)
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with bit field sizes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conditional operator ?: usage (Linux kernel)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem with bit field sizes
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- problem with bit field sizes
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- conditional operator ?: usage (Linux kernel)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Many unexpected warnings with current sparse
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Many unexpected warnings with current sparse
- From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Many unexpected warnings with current sparse
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Many unexpected warnings with current sparse
- From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Many unexpected warnings with current sparse
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: <linux/kernel.h>: container_of()
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: <linux/kernel.h>: container_of()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/18] add missing expansion of ASM operands
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/18] asm: fix missing expansion of asm statements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 18/18] asm: arrays & functions in non-memory operand degenerate into pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/18] asm: linearization of output memory operands is different
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/18] asm: fix liveness memory operand
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/18] asm: missing evaluation of asm statements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/18] asm: use a specific struct for asm operands
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/18] asm: use parse_asm_constraint() to verify constraints
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/18] asm: parse constraints
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/18] asm: keep using struct asm_operand during linearization
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/18] asm: check earlier that body & constraints are strings
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/18] string: use string_expression() in parse_static_assert()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/18] asm: add test evaluation, expansion & linearization of ASM operands
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/18] expand: add missing expansion of compound literals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/18] string: add helper string_expression()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/18] dissect: fix processing of ASM statements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/18] expand: add test for expansion of compound literals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] do not linearize invalid expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/18] shorter message for non-scalar in conditionals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/18] more consistent type info in error messages
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] add test for evaluation of invalid assignments
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/18] add missing expansion of ASM operands
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] do not linearize invalid expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] add test for evaluation of invalid assignments
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] do not linearize invalid expression
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: follow-up on printf formatting
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] constexpr: relax constexprness of constant conditionals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgcc: gendeps for -MM, -MD & -MMD too
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] remove useless optimization in cast_enum_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] add test for enum sign extension
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] add -Wformat
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- follow-up on printf formatting
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] validation: ignore temporary ~ files
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] parse: Fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] parse: Fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] parse: Fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] parse: Fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: enums and EXPR_VALUE and sign expansion
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] parse: Fix sign extension in casting enums
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: enums and EXPR_VALUE and sign expansion
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- enums and EXPR_VALUE and sign expansion
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: checkpatch warnings in sched.h
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
- From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: noreturn attribute doesn't work in smatch
- From: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: noreturn attribute doesn't work in smatch
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: noreturn attribute doesn't work in smatch
- From: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: noreturn attribute doesn't work in smatch
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 15/16] include/linux/compiler.h: remove unused KENTRY macro
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: noreturn attribute doesn't work in smatch
- From: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- noreturn attribute doesn't work in smatch
- From: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] net: can: Fix compiling warning
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/16] include/linux/compiler.h: remove unused KENTRY macro
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] net: can: Fix compiling warning
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next] net: can: Fix compiling warning
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Packed struct size issue
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Derek M Jones <derek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sparse context checking Vs Clang Thread Safety analysis
- From: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@xxxxxxxxx>
- <linux/kernel.h>: container_of()
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- problem building sparse 0.6.0 (sparse-llvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgcc: gendeps for -MM, -MD & -MMD too
- From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 2/4] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 1/4] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 4/4] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3 3/4] add -Wformat
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v3]
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2] - formatting checks
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] evaluate: correct order of arguments
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] va-arg processing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] add -Wformat
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2] - formatting checks
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] validation: ignore temporary ~ files
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] evaluate: correct order of arguments
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] va-arg processing
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] va-arg processing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] evaluate: correct order of arguments
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] add -Wformat
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] validation: ignore temporary ~ files
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] evaluate: check variadic argument types against formatting info
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] tests: add varargs printf format tests
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] parse: initial parsing of __attribute__((format))
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] add -Wformat
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] evaluate: correct order of arguments
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] validation: ignore temporary ~ files
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] va-arg processing
- From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix allowing casts of AS pointers to uintptr_t
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] casts from AS pointers and uintptr_t
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] man: explain role of uintptr_t & unsigned long in casts from AS pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] also accept casts of AS pointers to uintptr_t
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] casts from AS pointers and uintptr_t
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix error directive in argument list
- From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix error directive in argument list
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix error directive in argument list
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix error directive in argument list
- From: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 21/57] compiler.h: update definition of unreachable()
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 15/37] compiler.h: update definition of unreachable()
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] man: explain role of unsigned long in casts from AS pointers.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix error directive in argument list
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/fpu: Fix __user annotations
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/fpu: Fix __user annotations
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] evaluate: externally_visible functions don't need a declaration
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] evaluate: externally_visible functions don't need a declaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] evaluate: externally_visible functions don't need a declaration
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] include/linux/hugetlb.h: Convert to use vm_fault_t
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] include/linux/hugetlb.h: Convert to use vm_fault_t
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question regarding sparse warning about cast truncate
- From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question regarding sparse warning about cast truncate
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question regarding sparse warning about cast truncate
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] expand: 'conservative' must not bypass valid simplifications
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Simplify shift operations on constants
- From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@xxxxxxxx>
- [ANNOUNCE] Sparse v0.6.1-rc1
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cgcc: use strict & warnings
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] cgcc: -MF, -MQ & -MT need an argument
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] cgcc: gendeps for -MM, -MD & -MMD too
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] cgcc: handle -MM, -MD, -MMD, -MF, -MQ & -MT
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] evaluate: sizeof(bool) could be larger than sizeof(char)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/7] cgcc: add support for x86-x32
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] cgcc: simpler handling of hard-float ARM
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgcc: add pseudo-archs for ppc64be/ppc64le
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] evaluate: sizeof(bool) could be larger than sizeof(char)
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/7] cgcc: use gcc -dumpmachine
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cgcc: define __APPLE_CC__ on OSX
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] testsuite: fix bad escaping of '[' & ']'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] evaluate: sizeof(bool) could be larger than sizeof(char)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/7] cgcc: use gcc -dumpmachine
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/7] cgcc: use gcc -dumpmachine
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/7] cgcc: use gcc -dumpmachine
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] build: let CHECKER & CHECKER_FLAGS be internals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/7] cgcc: extract add_specs_os() from add_specs()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/7] cgcc: extract add_specs_arch() from add_specs()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/7] cgcc: add support for x86-x32
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/7] cgcc: favor using 'gcc -dumpmachine' to determine specifics
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/7] cgcc: simpler handling of hard-float ARM
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/7] cgcc: add pseudo-archs for ppc64be/ppc64le
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/7] cgcc: -dumpmachine should be fetched with '$ccom'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 0/7] cgcc: use gcc -dumpmachine
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] cgcc: use -mfloat-abi=hard for armhf
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] teach sparse about -msoft-float
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] teach sparse about -mfloat-abi on ARM
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] teach sparse about floating-point ABI (on ARM)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] build: let CHECKER & CHECKER_FLAGS be internals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] determine specifics using gcc -dumpmachine instead of uname -m
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] determine specifics using gcc -dumpmachine instead of uname -m
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] build: let CHECKER & CHECKER_FLAGS be internals
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/4] build: honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/4] build: get rid of MAN1DIR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/4] build: always use '-Wall -Wwrite-strings'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/4] build: let CHECKER & CHECKER_FLAGS be internals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/4] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] determine specifics using gcc -dumpmachine instead of uname -m
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] determine specifics using gcc -dumpmachine instead of uname -m
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] determine specifics using gcc -dumpmachine instead of uname -m
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] [RFC] determine specifics using gcc -dumpmachine instead of uname -m
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] honor CFLAGS & friends from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Some build failures of sparse 0.6.0 on Debian buildds
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Yet another failure on armhf and i386
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS from environment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Yet another failure on armhf and i386
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] honor CFLAGS from environment
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Some build failures of sparse 0.6.0 on Debian buildds
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Trinity Fuzzer Tool]
[Linux Kernel]
[Netdev]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]