On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:57:37PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 02/20, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Currently it is not possible to figure out the scope of the private > > > struct/union/enum type, its ->scope is NULL because bind_symbol() is > > > not called. > > > > > > Change struct_union_enum_specifier() to set sym->scope = block_scope > > > in this case, this is what bind_symbol() does when type has a name. > > > > Thanks. > > I've just changed the comment to "used by dissect" > > Great, thanks! > > > because > > elsewhere the scope or toplevel()s only relevant for symbols. > > Cough... can't resist ;) > > Not really, see struct_union_enum_specifier()->is_outer_scope(). But > yes sure, this is only when ->ident != NULL. Ah yes, sorry, I wasn't clear enough here. By 'symbol' here, I effectively meant: "a name (with its associated semantic)", not a 'struct symbol'. -- Luc
