On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:29:32PM +0000, Ramsay Jones wrote: > > > On 15/12/2019 16:28, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > The current message is very long (in most cases the position > > of the previous declaration is past the 80th column) and, > > while saying that the types differ, doesn't show these types. > > > > Change this by splitting the message in 2 parts: > > - first, on the current position, the main message > > and the type of the current declaration. > > - then the type of the previous declaration on its > > own position. > > Hmm, this loses information and, thus, is not necessarily an > improvement. The first test, below, illustrates this ... Absolutely. It wasn't intentional to drop the typediff. Thank you very much to noticing this! -- Luc
