Re: [PATCH 3/4] typeof: add a test for unexaminated typeof

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



typo in subject: s/unexaminated/unexamined/

On 09/11/2019 13:35, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> The base type of pointers are not examined when the pointer is.
> It neends to be done later when looked at.

s/neends/needs/

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

> 
> This may be a problem when show_typename() is used on a pointer
> which has not yet been 'deep-examined' and, for example, has a
> SYM_TYPEOF as its base type.
> 
> Add a test case showing the problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  validation/eval/typeof0.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 validation/eval/typeof0.c
> 
> diff --git a/validation/eval/typeof0.c b/validation/eval/typeof0.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..abef63865
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/validation/eval/typeof0.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +static int i;
> +static typeof(i) *ptr;
> +
> +/*
> + * check-name: eval-typeof0
> + * check-command: test-show-type $file
> + * check-known-to-fail
> + *
> + * check-output-ignore
> + * check-output-excludes: unknown type
> + */
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux