Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] arch: char32_t should be the same as uint32_t, not uint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27/11/2019 02:06, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> When the predefine for char32_t was added, it was made to
> correspond 'unsigned int' with the commit message saying
> some archs use 'unsigned long'. In fact, it appears that
> there char32_t is always uint32_t (on the archs & OSes

s/there char32_t/the char32_t type/ ?

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

> I'm using to look at this).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib.c b/lib.c
> index 57d2738bf..f9e7caf4a 100644
> --- a/lib.c
> +++ b/lib.c
> @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ static void predefined_macros(void)
>  	predefined_ctype("WCHAR",      wchar_ctype, PTYPE_ALL_T|PTYPE_MIN|PTYPE_TYPE);
>  	predefined_ctype("WINT",        wint_ctype, PTYPE_ALL_T|PTYPE_MIN|PTYPE_TYPE);
>  	predefined_ctype("CHAR16",   &ushort_ctype, PTYPE_TYPE);
> -	predefined_ctype("CHAR32",     &uint_ctype, PTYPE_TYPE);
> +	predefined_ctype("CHAR32",    uint32_ctype, PTYPE_TYPE);
>  
>  	predefined_ctype("INT",         &int_ctype, PTYPE_ALL);
>  	predefined_ctype("LONG",       &long_ctype, PTYPE_ALL);
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux