Re: [PATCH 0/5] improve diagnostic messages concerning bitfields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 08/12/2019 23:19, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> These few patches contains some fixes or improvements
> of diagnostic concerning the size of bitfields.
> 
> 
> This series is also available at:
>   git://github.com/lucvoo/sparse-dev.git bitfield-size

I tested these patches by applying them on top of current 'master'
branch (@817270f9). I tested in the usual way (Linux 32-&64-bit and
cygwin) including a quick run over git source, without issue.

Today, I noticed that the above branch was based on commit 9b2efc15
rather than 'master'. I just did a trial merge of 'luc/bitfield-size'
with 'master' and 'git-diff'ed the result against my tested branch
head - no difference shown. So, I think we are good! (famous last
words) ;-)

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

> 
> 
> Luc Van Oostenryck (5):
>   bitfield: add testcases for invalid bitfield width
>   bitfield: don't warn twice on invalid width
>   bitfield: oversized bitfields are errors
>   bitfield: keep the bitfield ident
>   bitfield: display the bitfield name in error messages
> 
>  parse.c                     | 10 ++++------
>  symbol.c                    | 10 ++++++----
>  validation/bitfield-sizes.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 validation/bitfield-sizes.c
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux