On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:45:01PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/2/19 2:23 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > > As an extension, allow conditional expressions (?:) with one > > side of type 'void' and consider the result to also be void. > > > > The warning can be reinstated with the flag '-Wcond-void'. > > > > Note: I only see a single occurrence of this in the kernel. > > Yes, I would prefer to eliminate that one. :) > > > Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I prefer > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I didn't try to Suggest this. Yes, true indeed. > One man page edit below... > > > +.B \-Wconditional\-void > > +Warn if one side of a conditional expression (\fB? :\fR) is of type > > +void and the other one not. > > +As an extension, Sparse consider the result of such expressions as also > > considers Fixed. Thanks, -- Luc
