On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:30:53PM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > The C standard doesn't require that the size of a _Bool is 1, > its size is implementation defined. > > However, in evaluate_sizeof() the assumption is made that > a bool is the same size as a char. > > Fix this wrong assumption by using the existing bits_in_bool. > > Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> I seem to recall this going back and forth at some point in Sparse's history, and that there were multiple places that assumed the size of a bool, not just this. I don't remember the conclusion of that (or if there was one), though.
