Linux RAID Storage Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [-mm PATCH 0/2] 74% decrease in dispatched writes, stripe-queue take3
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [-mm PATCH 2/2] raid5: use stripe_queues to prioritize the "most deserving" requests (take3)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [-mm PATCH 1/2] raid5: add the stripe_queue object for tracking raid io requests (take2)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [-mm PATCH 0/2] 74% decrease in dispatched writes, stripe-queue take3
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Raid array is not automatically detected.
- From: Bryan Christ <bryan.christ@xxxxxx>
- Re: Re-building an array
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3ware 9650 tips
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3ware 9650 tips
- From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>
- Re-building an array
- From: mail <lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3ware 9650 tips
- From: Jon Collette <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3ware 9650 tips
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm create to existing raid5
- From: Jon Collette <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] ioat fixes, raid5 acceleration, and the async_tx api
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Ric Wheeler <ric@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm create to existing raid5
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm create to existing raid5
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Man page patch (manage mode options clarification)
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Man page patch (bold font for option names in MISC MODE section)
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- RE: mdadm create to existing raid5
- From: "Guy Watkins" <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Guy Watkins" <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm create to existing raid5
- From: Jon Collette <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Ric Wheeler <ric@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: "Johny Mail list" <maillist.johny@xxxxxxxxx>
- adding drives / growing RAID-10?
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Ric Wheeler <ric@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: jahammonds prost <gmitch64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Resizing RAID1 on top of LVM2 LVs
- From: "Grzegorz Nosek" <grzegorz.nosek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: jahammonds prost <gmitch64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: jahammonds prost <gmitch64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Ric Wheeler <ric@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Re: RAID performance is not too well....
- From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proposed enhancement to mdadm: Allow "--write-behind=" to be done in grow mode.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: nested raid possible?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Proposed enhancement to mdadm: Allow "--write-behind=" to be done in grow mode.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 recover after a 2 disk failure
- From: Frank Jenkins <fjenkins873@xxxxxxxxx>
- md looping on recovery of raid1 array
- From: Ryan_MichaelS@xxxxxxx
- Re: nested raid possible?
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nested raid possible?
- From: Simon Valiquette <v.simon@xxxxxxxx>
- nested raid possible?
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] raid5: 65% sequential-write performance improvement, stripe-queue take2
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dirty flag during resync
- From: "Vincze, Tamas" <vincze@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Expanding a RAID-5 in use from 3 disks to 6 disks
- From: "David Rees" <drees76@xxxxxxxxx>
- Expanding a RAID-5 in use from 3 disks to 6 disks
- From: acostoya <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dead RAID5!
- From: John Rowe <rowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: The array is functioning normally (?)
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- AW: The array is functioning normally (?)
- From: "Heinzmann, Robert" <Heinzmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- The array is functioning normally (?)
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- I/O is retried forever if last disk in a md device fails
- From: "Heinzmann, Robert" <Heinzmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proposed enhancement to mdadm: Allow "--write-behind=" to be done in grow mode.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] raid5: 65% sequential-write performance improvement, stripe-queue take2
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proposed enhancement to mdadm: Allow "--write-behind=" to be done in grow mode.
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] raid5: use stripe_queues to prioritize the "most deserving" requests, take2
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/2] raid5: add the stripe_queue object for tracking raid io requests
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/2] raid5: 65% sequential-write performance improvement, stripe-queue take2
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx>
- Re: spare not becoming active
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: spare not becoming active
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: spare not becoming active
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: spare not becoming active
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Patrik Jonsson <patrik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Behavior of mdadm depending on user
- From: Michael <michael@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Behavior of mdadm depending on user
- From: "Michael Schwarz" <mschwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Proposed enhancement to mdadm: Allow "--write-behind=" to be done in grow mode.
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Proposed enhancement to mdadm: Allow "--write-behind=" to be done in grow mode.
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Behavior of mdadm depending on user
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: "Johny Mail list" <maillist.johny@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Behavior of mdadm depending on user
- From: "Michael Schwarz" <mschwarz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID5 Expansion
- From: jahammonds prost <gmitch64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID5 not being reassembled correctly after device swap
- From: Michael Frotscher <infomails@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- best way to create RAID10 on an CentOS5 install
- From: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does "--write-behind=" have to be done at create time?
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- XFS mount option performance on Linux Software RAID 5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: spare not becoming active
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Does "--write-behind=" have to be done at create time?
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm usage: creating arrays with helpful names?
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm usage: creating arrays with helpful names?
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fastest Chunk Size w/XFS For MD Software RAID = 1024k
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: deliberately degrading RAID1 to a single disk, then back again
- From: Mike Accetta <maccetta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- spare not becoming active
- From: Simon <simon.xhz@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] raid5: use stripe_queues to prioritize the "most deserving" requests
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/2] raid5: add the stripe_queue object for tracking raid io requests
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/2] An evolutionary change to the raid456 queuing model
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [md-accel PATCH 00/19] md raid acceleration and the async_tx api
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md-accel PATCH 00/19] md raid acceleration and the async_tx api
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [md-accel PATCH 03/19] xor: make 'xor_blocks' a library routine for use with async_tx
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md-accel PATCH 03/19] xor: make 'xor_blocks' a library routine for use with async_tx
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Andrew Burgess <aab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: "Johny Mail list" <maillist.johny@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm usage: creating arrays with helpful names?
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md-accel PATCH 03/19] xor: make 'xor_blocks' a library routine for use with async_tx
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md-accel PATCH 00/19] md raid acceleration and the async_tx api
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [md-accel PATCH 00/19] md raid acceleration and the async_tx api
- From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 19/19] ARM: Add drivers/dma to arch/arm/Kconfig
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 18/19] iop3xx: surface the iop3xx DMA and AAU units to the iop-adma driver
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 17/19] iop13xx: surface the iop13xx adma units to the iop-adma driver
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 16/19] dmaengine: driver for the iop32x, iop33x, and iop13xx raid engines
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 15/19] md: remove raid5 compute_block and compute_parity5
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 14/19] md: handle_stripe5 - request io processing in raid5_run_ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 13/19] md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async expand ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 12/19] md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async read ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 11/19] md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async check ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 10/19] md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async compute ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 09/19] md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async write ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 08/19] md: common infrastructure for running operations with raid5_run_ops
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 07/19] md: raid5_run_ops - run stripe operations outside sh->lock
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 05/19] raid5: refactor handle_stripe5 and handle_stripe6 (v2)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 06/19] raid5: replace custom debug PRINTKs with standard pr_debug
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 04/19] async_tx: add the async_tx api
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 03/19] xor: make 'xor_blocks' a library routine for use with async_tx
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 02/19] dmaengine: make clients responsible for managing channels
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 01/19] dmaengine: refactor dmaengine around dma_async_tx_descriptor
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [md-accel PATCH 00/19] md raid acceleration and the async_tx api
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm usage: creating arrays with helpful names?
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: deliberately degrading RAID1 to a single disk, then back again
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- deliberately degrading RAID1 to a single disk, then back again
- From: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Linux Software RAID is really RAID?
- From: "Johny Mail list" <maillist.johny@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: if (stripe_cache_size =< chunk_size) { BUG() }
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- if (stripe_cache_size =< chunk_size) { BUG() }
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid=noautodetect is apparently ignored?
- From: Ian Dall <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance [BUG with =64kb]
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance [BUG with =64kb]
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance [BUG with =64kb]
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance [BUG with =64kb]
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: "Thorsten Wolf" <T_Wolf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 Grow
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 5 Grow
- From: Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded array on every reboot
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: jahammonds prost <gmitch64@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Degraded array on every reboot
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Degraded array on every reboot
- From: "John Hendrikx" <hjohn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- stripe_cache_size and performance
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Mark Lord <lkml@xxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen)
- Auto rebuild of Firewire/USB drive in 3-way RAID1
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: suggestions for inexpensive linux jbod?
- From: Sven Rudolph <Sven_Rudolph@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Michael <big_green_jelly_bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 recover after a 2 disk failure
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- Re: raid5 recover after a 2 disk failure
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: raid5 recover after a 2 disk failure
- From: Frank Jenkins <fjenkins873@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: suggestions for inexpensive linux jbod?
- Re: suggestions for inexpensive linux jbod?
- From: Mike <mikee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: suggestions for inexpensive linux jbod?
- From: Mike <mikee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH git-md-accel 1/2] raid5: refactor handle_stripe5 and handle_stripe6
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH git-md-accel 2/2] raid5: replace custom debug print with standard pr_debug
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH git-md-accel 1/2] raid5: refactor handle_stripe5 and handle_stripe6
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH git-md-accel 0/2] raid5 refactor, and pr_debug cleanup
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: limits on raid
- From: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- stop sync?
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: resync to last 27h - usually 3. what's this?
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: suggestions for inexpensive linux jbod?
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: resync to last 27h - usually 3. what's this?
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- suggestions for inexpensive linux jbod?
- From: Mike <mikee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: resync to last 27h - usually 3. what's this?
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- resync to last 27h - usually 3. what's this?
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS Tunables for High Speed Linux SW RAID5 Systems?
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Machine hanging on synchronize cache on shutdown 2.6.22-rc4-git[45678]
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Machine hanging on synchronize cache on shutdown 2.6.22-rc4-git[45678]
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Machine hanging on synchronize cache on shutdown 2.6.22-rc4-git[45678]
- From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS Tunables for High Speed Linux SW RAID5 Systems?
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Machine hanging on synchronize cache on shutdown 2.6.22-rc4-git[45678]
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS Tunables for High Speed Linux SW RAID5 Systems?
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Software based SATA RAID-5 expandable arrays?
- From: greenjelly <big_green_jelly_Bean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.22-rc4 BUG
- Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: raid5 recover after a 2 disk failure
- From: "frank jenkins" <fjenkins873@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5 recover after a 2 disk failure
- From: "frank jenkins" <fjenkins873@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx>
- raid synchronization too aggressive in 2.6.21?
- From: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Machine hanging on synchronize cache on shutdown 2.6.22-rc4-git[45678]
- From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Luca Berra <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Machine hanging on synchronize cache on shutdown 2.6.22-rc4-git[45678]
- From: Brad Campbell <brad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: "Dan Merillat" <dan.merillat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Wakko Warner <wakko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: XFS Tunables for High Speed Linux SW RAID5 Systems?
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- XFS Tunables for High Speed Linux SW RAID5 Systems?
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- need help in recovering a RAID
- From: "Thorsten Wolf" <T_Wolf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: limits on raid
- Re: limits on raid
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- limits on raid
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Removing devices from RAID-5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removing devices from RAID-5
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removing devices from RAID-5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removing devices from RAID-5
- From: Rich Walker <rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Removing devices from RAID-5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Removing devices from RAID-5
- From: Rich Walker <rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Luca Berra <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cluster Aware MD Driver
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Cluster Aware MD Driver
- From: Xinwei Hu <hxinwei@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: "Thorsten Wolf" <T_Wolf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: spare group
- From: Tomka Gergely <tomka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: dealing with bad blocks: another view
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- raid1 with nbd member hangs MD on SLES10 and RHEL5
- From: "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: coding style cleanup / refactor
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mdadm recovery in infinite loop
- From: "Kyle Harris" <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 000 of 2] md: Introduction - bugfixes for md/raid{1,10}
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Some RAID levels do not support bitmap
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: spare group
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: spare group
- From: Tomka Gergely <tomka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- SLES 9 SP3 and mdadm 2.6.1 (via rpm)
- From: "Thorsten Wolf" <T_Wolf@xxxxxxx>
- Re: spare group
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: spare group
- From: Tomka Gergely <tomka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH]is_power_of_2-dm
- From: vignesh babu <vignesh.babu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: conflicting superblocks - Re: what is the best approach for fixing a degraded RAID5 (one drive failed) using mdadm?
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- conflicting superblocks - Re: what is the best approach for fixing a degraded RAID5 (one drive failed) using mdadm?
- From: simon redfern <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 002 of 2] md: Fix bug in error handling during raid1 repair.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 000 of 2] md: Introduction - bugfixes for md/raid{1,10}
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 001 of 2] md: Fix two raid10 bugs.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: spare group
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Some RAID levels do not support bitmap
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Some RAID levels do not support bitmap
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Paranoid read mode for raid5/6
- From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Paranoid read mode for raid5/6
- From: Mattias Wadenstein <maswan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- spare group
- From: Tomka Gergely <tomka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- what is the best approach for fixing a degraded RAID5 (one drive failed) using mdadm?
- From: simon redfern <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- Some RAID levels do not support bitmap
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM on raid10 - severe performance drop
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- below 10MB/s write on raid5
- From: Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Iain Rauch <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LVM on raid10 - severe performance drop
- From: Bernd Schubert <bs@xxxxxxxxx>
- LVM on raid10 - severe performance drop
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about --assume-clean
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- question about --assume-clean
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help on Recovering a Corrupted raid5 Partition
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help on Recovering a Corrupted raid5 Partition
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Help on Recovering a Corrupted raid5 Partition
- From: phyros <dlopuch@xxxxxxx>
- [patch 06/54] md: Dont write more than is required of the last page of a bitmap
- From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 05/54] md: Avoid overflow in raid0 calculation with large components.
- From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: "Tuomas Leikola" <tuomas.leikola@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Regarding odd RAID5 I/O patterns
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Regarding odd RAID5 I/O patterns
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Regarding odd RAID5 I/O patterns
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx>
- bug report on mdadm --export
- From: Hubert Verstraete <hubskml@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Iustin Pop <iusty@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] md: comment add_stripe_bio
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Iain Rauch <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- RE: multiple xor_block() functions
- From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problems with faulty disks and superblocks 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2
- From: Hubert Verstraete <hubskml@xxxxxxx>
- minimum speed for raid5 check
- From: carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Carlos Carvalho)
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID6 clean?
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID6 clean?
- From: "Guy Watkins" <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: "Daniel Korstad" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 5 HDD RAID5 not starting after controller failure
- From: Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 5 HDD RAID5 not starting after controller failure
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- 5 HDD RAID5 not starting after controller failure
- From: Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: tj <lists@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Guy Watkins" <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Iain Rauch <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Iain Rauch <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Iain Rauch <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: multiple xor_block() functions
- From: Jouni Malinen <j@xxxxx>
- multiple xor_block() functions
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 6 grow problem
- From: Iain Rauch <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Customize the error emails of `mdadm --monitor`
- From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: When does a disk get flagged as bad?
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: When does a disk get flagged as bad?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- possible logic bug in raid5.c
- From: Jens Laas <jens.laas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 check/repair read error recovery in 2.6.20
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- MD device flag from spare to active
- From: Philip Bergen <philip.bergen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: very strange (maybe) raid1 testing results
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Stefan Bader" <Stefan.Bader@xxxxxxxxxx>
- problems with faulty disks and superblocks 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2
- From: Hubert Verstraete <hubskml@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: When does a disk get flagged as bad?
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: very strange (maybe) raid1 testing results
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating RAID1 with bitmap fails
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: very strange (maybe) raid1 testing results
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: very strange (maybe) raid1 testing results
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: When does a disk get flagged as bad?
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: very strange (maybe) raid1 testing results
- From: Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: When does a disk get flagged as bad?
- From: Mike Accetta <maccetta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- very strange (maybe) raid1 testing results
- From: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating RAID1 with bitmap fails
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- dm-crypt issue
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Nix <nix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating RAID1 with bitmap fails
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mismatch_cnt = 128 for root (/) md raid1 device
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Creating RAID1 with bitmap fails
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Creating RAID1 with bitmap fails
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.2 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Stefan Bader" <Stefan.Bader@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Stefan Bader" <Stefan.Bader@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.2 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.2 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 kernel panic on sparc64
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID SB 1.x autodetection
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.2 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Stefan Bader" <sbader3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Stefan Bader" <sbader3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshaping raid0/10
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid state diagram
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Nikita Danilov <nikita@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- assemble array without rebuild - readonly mode?
- From: Tim Harvey <tim_harvey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: tj <lists@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 kernel panic on sparc64
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 kernel panic on sparc64
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid state diagram
- From: Tomka Gergely <tomka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
- mismatch_cnt = 128 for root (/) md raid1 device
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: "Stefan Bader" <Stefan.Bader@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- When does a disk get flagged as bad?
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 check/repair read error recovery in 2.6.20
- From: Mike Accetta <maccetta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Thomas Jager <lists@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Identify SATA Disks
- From: Gabor Gombas <gombasg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Identify SATA Disks
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Identify SATA Disks
- From: Colin McCabe <Colin.P.McCabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Identify SATA Disks
- From: Colin McCabe <Colin.P.McCabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
- From: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Identify SATA Disks
- From: "lewis shobbrook" <lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- I/O errors, server unresponsive, array NOT-degraded
- From: Alberto Alonso <alberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm on huge raid sets
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm on huge raid sets
- From: Erich Weiler <weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid-5 long write wait while reading
- From: Thomas Jager <lists@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding larger disks to RAID5
- From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: not resyncing after power cut.
- From: "Chris Fanning" <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: not resyncing after power cut.
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm, raid10, and problem
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding larger disks to RAID5
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding larger disks to RAID5
- From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <brugolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Adding larger disks to RAID5
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Adding larger disks to RAID5
- From: Christian <cjs@xxxxxxx>
- Re: not resyncing after power cut.
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 39/69] md: Avoid a possibility that a read error can wrongly propagate through md/raid1 to a filesystem.
- From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- not resyncing after power cut.
- From: "Chris Fanning" <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>
- ANNOUNCE: mdadm 2.6.2 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 007 of 7] md: Change bitmap_unplug and others to void functions.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 006 of 7] md: Check that internal bitmap does not overlap other data.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 005 of 7] md: Improve the is_mddev_idle test fix
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 004 of 7] md: Improve message about invalid superblock during autodetect.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 003 of 7] md: Fix bug with linear hot-add and elsewhere.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 002 of 7] md: Don't write more than is required of the last page of a bitmap
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 001 of 7] md: Avoid overflow in raid0 calculation with large components.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 000 of 7] md: Introduction EXPLAIN PATCH SET HERE
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm, raid10, and problem
- From: "Maciej 'Agaran' Pijanka" <agaran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: "Colin McCabe" <colin.p.mccabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: Colin McCabe <Colin.P.McCabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: Andrew Burgess <aab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Jeff Zheng" <Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Jeff Zheng" <Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Jeff Zheng" <Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Jeff Zheng" <Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Jeff Zheng" <Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: "Colin McCabe" <colin.p.mccabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: "Colin McCabe" <colin.p.mccabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Md corruption using RAID10 on linux-2.6.21
- From: "Don Dupuis" <dondster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery of software RAID5 using FC6 rescue?
- From: "Mark A. O'Neil" <mark.a.oneil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- unreadable drives can be synchronized?
- From: "Colin McCabe" <colin.p.mccabe@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Jeff Zheng" <Jeff.Zheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Software raid0 will crash the file-system, when each disk is 5TB
- From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Gregory Seidman <gsslist+linuxraid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to synchronize two devices (RAID-1, but not really?)
- From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]