On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:49:24PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS > > filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only > > Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen? They issue async I/O before they sleep and expects processing to be done on I/O completion via workqueues. > > safe thing to do is freeze the filesystem before suspend and thaw it after > > resume. This is why I originally asked you to test that with the other problem > > Could you add that to the XFS threads if it is really required? They > do know that they are being frozen for suspend. We don't suspend the threads on a filesystem freeze - they continue run. A filesystem freeze guarantees the filesystem clean and that the in memory state matches what is on disk. It is not possible for the filesytem to issue I/O or have outstanding I/O when it is in the frozen state, so the state of the threads and/or workqueues does not matter because they will be idle. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
