Re: limits on raid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



david@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, David Chinner wrote:
one of the 'killer features' of zfs is that it does checksums of every file on disk. so many people don't consider the disk infallable.

several other filesystems also do checksums

both bitkeeper and git do checksums of files to detect disk corruption

How different is that to raid1/5/6 being set to a 'paranoid' "read-verify" mode (as per Dan's recent email) where a read reads from _all_ spindles and verifies (and with R6 maybe corrects) the stripe before returning it?

Doesn't solve DaveC's issue about the fs doing redundancy but isn't that essentially just fs level mirroring?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux