Re: Software RAID5 Horrible Write Speed On 3ware Controller!!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:51:16PM +0100, Robin Hill wrote:

> Just to pick up on this one (as I'm about to reformat my array as XFS) -
> does this actually work with a hardware controller?  Is there any
> assurance that the XFS stripes align with the hardware RAID stripes?  Or
> could you just end up offsetting everything so that every 128k chunk on
> the XFS side of things fits half-and-half into two hardware raid chunks
> (especially if the array has been partitioned)?

If you partition the device and does not explicitely align the
partitions on a stripe boundary then you'll get that effect. Also if you
do not use partitions but use LVM instead, then the stripe size should
be a power of 2 meaning the number of data disks should also be a power
of 2 to get the best performance.

> In which case would
> it be better (performance-wise) to provide the su,sw values or not?

Only testing can tell... But if one logical file system block spans
multiple stripes then you will lose some performance; if that will be
noticable or not depends on your usage pattern.

Gabor

-- 
     ---------------------------------------------------------
     MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences
     ---------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux