On 6/18/07, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...
+static void handle_stripe_expansion(raid5_conf_t *conf, struct stripe_head *sh, + struct r6_state *r6s) +{ + int i; + + /* We have read all the blocks in this stripe and now we need to + * copy some of them into a target stripe for expand. + */ + clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state); + for (i = 0; i < sh->disks; i++) + if (i != sh->pd_idx && (r6s && i != r6s->qd_idx)) { + int dd_idx, pd_idx, j; + struct stripe_head *sh2; + + sector_t bn = compute_blocknr(sh, i); + sector_t s = raid5_compute_sector(bn, conf->raid_disks, + conf->raid_disks-1, &dd_idx, + &pd_idx, conf);
this bug made it through the regression test: 'conf->raid_disks-1' should be 'conf->raid_disks - conf->max_degraded' -- Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html