Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: [dm-devel] mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 (netfilter)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 (netfilter)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] avr: Fix sanitize tsk_is_polling fallout
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless-next tree related)
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless-next tree related)
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
  • From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the remoteproc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the remoteproc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-06-19-14-24 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (mfd/max77693-irq.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix up CROSS_COMPILE and READABLE_ASM interaction.
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix up CROSS_COMPILE and READABLE_ASM interaction.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
  • From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi and battery trees related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi and battery trees related)
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the battery tree
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi and battery trees related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the battery tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (netfilter nfconntrack)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (netfilter nfconntrack)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: a0393909 <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] avr: Fix sanitize tsk_is_polling fallout
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (staging/comedi)
  • From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (vsmp)
  • From: "Shai Fultheim (Shai@xxxxxxxxxxx)" <Shai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (vsmp)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: netx: Reuse dummy clk routines for non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK case
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ARM: netx: Reuse dummy clk routines for non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK case
  • From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] x86: fix apic non-ISO code warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: gadget: add multiple definition guards
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging/comedi: fix build for USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7298: Fix linker error due to missing IIO kfifo buffer
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: gadget: add multiple definition guards
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree today
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: frontswap.v16 now in Linus tree, please stop pulling frontswap for linux-next
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• frontswap.v16 now in Linus tree, please stop pulling frontswap for linux-next
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] staging: comedi: das08: Reduce conditional compilation
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging: comedi: das08: Reduce conditional compilation
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (comedi/das08.c)
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (staging/iio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (comedi/das08.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (mfd/twl6040-irq)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (mfd/twl6040-irq)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 (scsi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: radio-maxiradio.c: undefined reference to `snd_tea575x_init'
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: radio-maxiradio.c: undefined reference to `snd_tea575x_init'
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• radio-maxiradio.c: undefined reference to `snd_tea575x_init'
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Chris Metcalf <cdmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 (scsi)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: MR Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: MR Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: time to clean up your trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] acpi: fix acpi_bus.h warnings when ACPI is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] acpi: fix acpi_bus.h warnings when ACPI is not enabled
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 (scsi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request to add linux-leds git tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
  • From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build rebase of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Request to add linux-leds git tree to linux-next
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] s390/signal: fix compile error
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] s390/signal: fix compile error
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot failuresfor next-20120601
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (signal tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build rebase of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fate of the modem-shm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: fate of the modem-shm tree
  • From: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the bjdooks-i2c tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the fsnotify tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the modem-shm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "x86, realmode: Move ACPI wakeup to unified realmode code" commit breaks ia64
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc tree related)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• wlcore.ko undefined symbols
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the dma-mapping tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree today
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: usual request
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (hwmon/sch56xx)
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (hwmon/sch56xx)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "blackfin: twi: move twi bit mask macro to twi head file"
  • From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "blackfin: twi: move twi bit mask macro to twi head file"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (watchdog tree related)
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] acpi: fix acpi_bus.h warnings when ACPI is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [SOLUTION] linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (watchdog tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: signal.git
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• signal.git
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch] sched, numa: Allocate node_queue on any node for offline nodes
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for May 22, 2012
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad merge in the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] x86: auto poll/interrupt mode switch for CMC to stop CMC storm
  • From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: auto poll/interrupt mode switch for CMC to stop CMC storm
  • From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 22, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad ux500 merge fix leads to linux-next failure
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• Bad ux500 merge fix leads to linux-next failure
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: bad commit in the cgroup tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad commit in the cgroup tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch the watchdog tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (regmap-irq)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with Linus' tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch the watchdog tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the tip tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• RE: [PATCH -next v2] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Vipul Pandya <vipul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the gpio tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (userns tree related)
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next v2] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drm drivers and vgacon)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (edac)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drm drivers and vgacon)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] comedi: fix build when USB is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] comedi: fix build when USB is not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] comedi: fix build when USB is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "edac: Remove the legacy EDAC ABI"
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "edac: Remove the legacy EDAC ABI"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/mc13xxx)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the isci tree with the scsi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Having a linux-next feed tree based on net-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Having a linux-next feed tree based on net-next
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• [PATCH -next] staging: gdm72xx depends on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wdt: fix iTCO printk format warnings
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wdt: ie6xx_wdt needs io.h
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: question about the sound tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: question about the sound tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: bad commit in the tile tree
  • From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: question about the sound tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad commit in the tile tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: WIMAX_GDM72XX_USB_PM should depend on USB_SUSPEND
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: WIMAX_GDM72XX_USB_PM should depend on USB_SUSPEND
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/mc13xxx)
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the tree
  • From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/mc13xxx)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the userns tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (userns tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the arm tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (fs/inode.c)
  • From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next commit "ARM: dma-mapping: move all dma bounce code to separate dma ops structure"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] net/codel: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] net/codel: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] nfc: shdlc needs to select CRC_CCITT
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] wdt: fix iTCO printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] wdt: ie6xx_wdt needs io.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] nfc: shdlc needs to select CRC_CCITT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] net/codel: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] watchdog: fix ie6xx_wdt.c printk format warning
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] via_wdt: depends on PCI
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the omap_dss2 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the origin tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the cifs tree
  • From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed to fetch the cifs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] watchdog: fix ie6xx_wdt.c printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (perf_event_amd.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] via_wdt: depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] printk: add stub for prepend_timestamp()
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (printk)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the usb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCHv9 10/10] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
  • From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 10, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHv9 10/10] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (fs/inode.c)
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] printk: correctly align __log_buf
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] printk: correctly align __log_buf
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>